White people are bad... Minorities and Immigration are good!

[RW]

It's not so much a case of the left controls Gaagle as it is that Gaagle is left along with all the other culprits in virtual monopoly control of searches and communications .. and all are  FAR from playing it neutral of late



From several tests I used and from day to day use, things have gotten very control freak very fast of late



CEO statements on issues make their positions very clear

It's not the only game in town when it comes to search engines (or anything else it offers really).



Again....credible links to Google impropriety please otherwise this is just speculative ass talking.

[RW]

Google is way too powerful.



I don't know what old school antitrust legislation can do about it, but it's a problem that will have to be considered sooner or later.

Way too powerful in what way?  Why would antitrust step in?  They are basically an advertising conduit.

[Wazzzup]

It is out of control and a virtual monopoly, as are FarceBook, Twatter  etc.  I don't see Congress saying or doing much about it so far



All those names becoming "generic" doesn't seem enough of a clue to get through to them yet

 I doubt that congress will do anything, the republicans are complete cowards.    Republicans control all three branches of government, and still the left gets 75 to 80% what it wants.



Maybe when it all ends up in ruins. America 2.0 will demand a media that is not just a left wing propaganda and disinformation machine.  



BTW on that note google is leftist, they donated 11.5 million to left wing race groups associated with black lives matter.  They fired that guy who complained about discriminatory gender practices and they just publicly ripped trump over DACA too.  they are partisans, is it any surprise that is reflected in their search engines? no.



Paypal is similar, they just cut pam Gellar loose and they almost cut off Jihadwatch, but Jihadwatch made enough noise so they backed off, for now.



Facebook is censoring all kinds of stuff.  Youtube the same.



Its all an orwellian leftist's dream come true.

[cc]

No idea of nor interest in what that (3 consecutive posts up above) says, but from past experience



and at the overtime rate yer workin yet buns off to spin for the monster,



I'm guessin the lipstick for that PIG will need constant replacement



It's smelling like a San Fran cosmetics shop in 100 degree weather and no air conditioning around here

[RW]

Sorry...one more thing...



Just because sites go offline or are removed, doesn't mean it was done by Google.  You have domain registrars, web hosting companies (that's the main one) and ISPs that will remove sites as well. So be sure what you are attributing to Google is actually Google's doing aka realise that if it no longer comes up on Google doesn't mean THEY removed the content.

[RW]

It is out of control and a virtual monopoly, as are FarceBook, Twatter  etc.  I don't see Congress saying or doing much about it so far



All those names becoming "generic" doesn't seem enough of a clue to get through to them yet

 I doubt that congress will do anything, the republicans are complete cowards.    Republicans control all three branches of government, and still the left gets 75 to 80% what it wants.



Maybe when it all ends up in ruins. America 2.0 will demand a media that is not just a left wing propaganda and disinformation machine.  



BTW on that note google is leftist, they donated 11.5 million to left wing race groups associated with black lives matter.  they just publicly ripped trump over DACA too.  they are partisans, is it any surprise that is reflected in their search engines? no.



Paypal is similar, they just cut pam Gellar loose and they almost cut off Jihadwatch, but Jihad watch made enough noise so they backed off, for now.



Facebook is censoring all kinds of stuff.  Youtube the same.



Its all an orwellian leftist's dream come true.

They always have censorsed based on their acceptable usepolicies.  This isn't new but shouldn't companies be allowed to decide what content they wish to host?



Y'all also understand there can be legal liabilities involved in hosting content right?

[RW]

No idea of nor interest in what that (3 consecutive posts) says, but from past experience



I'm guessin the lipstick for that PIG will need constant replacement

Yeah I know cc.  Whenever asked to put up, you shut up (after the gibberish laced pot shot of course).

[Blazor]

Pulling it out my ass? Here, I didnt even wipe 'em off!  





https://www.rt.com/news/173308-hidden-censorship-forgotten-google/">https://www.rt.com/news/173308-hidden-c ... en-google/">https://www.rt.com/news/173308-hidden-censorship-forgotten-google/



http://www.dailywire.com/news/10838/new-blacklist-daily-wire-added-fake-news-directory-john-nolte">http://www.dailywire.com/news/10838/new ... john-nolte">http://www.dailywire.com/news/10838/new-blacklist-daily-wire-added-fake-news-directory-john-nolte



https://www.hobo-web.co.uk/censoring-autocomplete-results-for-celebrities/">https://www.hobo-web.co.uk/censoring-au ... lebrities/">https://www.hobo-web.co.uk/censoring-autocomplete-results-for-celebrities/



https://www.activistpost.com/2017/08/youtube-begins-purging-alternative-media-deep-state-marches-toward-ww3.html">https://www.activistpost.com/2017/08/yo ... d-ww3.html">https://www.activistpost.com/2017/08/youtube-begins-purging-alternative-media-deep-state-marches-toward-ww3.html



http://www.npr.org/sections/alltechconsidered/2017/08/23/545320833/unlikely-allies-join-fight-to-protect-free-speech-on-the-internet">http://www.npr.org/sections/alltechcons ... e-internet">http://www.npr.org/sections/alltechconsidered/2017/08/23/545320833/unlikely-allies-join-fight-to-protect-free-speech-on-the-internet



Even the left now under attack...



https://www.oneangrygamer.net/2017/08/google-is-blacklisting-sjw-websites-from-search-results-reports-wsws/38020/">https://www.oneangrygamer.net/2017/08/g ... sws/38020/">https://www.oneangrygamer.net/2017/08/google-is-blacklisting-sjw-websites-from-search-results-reports-wsws/38020/



More than what I linked, this is a sample, to show it is happening.





The very first thing I remember seeing "blacklisted" or censored, was Confederate flags. It was all over the news when it happened, back when that kid shot up that church.



Cooter from Dukes of Hazzard was pissed! Cant say I blame him, as my son and I were too.

[RW]

Thank you for taking the time to reply.  



https://www.rt.com/news/173308-hidden-censorship-forgotten-google/">https://www.rt.com/news/173308-hidden-c ... en-google/">https://www.rt.com/news/173308-hidden-censorship-forgotten-google/

WARNING: This is a fake news website. This is a Russian state sponsored news organization that publishes fake & misleading information.



http://www.dailywire.com/news/10838/new-blacklist-daily-wire-added-fake-news-directory-john-nolte">http://www.dailywire.com/news/10838/new ... john-nolte">http://www.dailywire.com/news/10838/new-blacklist-daily-wire-added-fake-news-directory-john-nolte

WARNING: This is an unreliable news website.  It also say damn near fuck all about Google.



https://www.hobo-web.co.uk/censoring-autocomplete-results-for-celebrities/">https://www.hobo-web.co.uk/censoring-au ... lebrities/">https://www.hobo-web.co.uk/censoring-autocomplete-results-for-celebrities/

This website is either not a news website or hasn't been reviewed by our algorithms yet.

This is a site trying to get you to use their SEO services.  Looks like a scam.



https://www.activistpost.com/2017/08/youtube-begins-purging-alternative-media-deep-state-marches-toward-ww3.html">https://www.activistpost.com/2017/08/yo ... d-ww3.html">https://www.activistpost.com/2017/08/youtube-begins-purging-alternative-media-deep-state-marches-toward-ww3.html

WARNING: This is a fake news website.



http://www.npr.org/sections/alltechconsidered/2017/08/23/545320833/unlikely-allies-join-fight-to-protect-free-speech-on-the-internet">http://www.npr.org/sections/alltechcons ... e-internet">http://www.npr.org/sections/alltechconsidered/2017/08/23/545320833/unlikely-allies-join-fight-to-protect-free-speech-on-the-internet

This is a reliable source and interesting.

"Its [Daily Stormer] domain name was taken away by GoDaddy GoDaddy. Google stopped linking to it." Of course Google stopped linkeing to it.  It isn't an active site anymore.  But they did not registrer their domain as "We are cancelling Daily Stormer's registration with Google Domains for violating our terms of service," a Google spokesperson told NPR on Monday."

You can make the argument that they censor with their domain registration but that's not search results as was claimed.



Oh and here's a very obvious but valid point: Companies like Google and Facebook are not covered by the First Amendment, which applies only to the federal government.



Even the left now under attack...



https://www.oneangrygamer.net/2017/08/google-is-blacklisting-sjw-websites-from-search-results-reports-wsws/38020/">https://www.oneangrygamer.net/2017/08/g ... sws/38020/">https://www.oneangrygamer.net/2017/08/google-is-blacklisting-sjw-websites-from-search-results-reports-wsws/38020/

This is some guy's blog.

The very first thing I remember seeing "blacklisted" or censored, was Confederate flags. It was all over the news when it happened, back when that kid shot up that church.

Cooter from Dukes of Hazzard was pissed! Cant say I blame him, as my son and I were too.

I met Bo Duke IRL, eh?  :D



I don't understand.  I just did a search for Confederate Flag and images of it came up on Google.  What gives?

[cc]

WAIT WAIT .... There's an alternative



Bing is "the 2nd largest search engine"   ac_dance





OOPs, that's Gates

[RW]

WAIT WAIT .... There's an alternative



Bing is "the 2nd largest search engine"



OOPs, that's Gates

There's Bing, Yahoo, Duck Duck Go, tons of industry specific ones, dark web ones, etc.  Google isn't the only player in town - just the biggest.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_search_engines">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_search_engines

[RW]

I have to say I think Google's biggest failing is "original content".  I think Google has propegated the creation of false information by ranking "original content" higher in their algorythms rather than ranking on higher site popularity, etc.  



We do have to keep in mind that Google is under no obligatio to host, rank, etc anything.  It's a private company but it's a company that relies on a large user base because...it's a conduit for advertising.  That's where a lot of it's money come from.



Follow the money folks.

[Blazor]

I met Bo Duke IRL, eh?  :D



I don't understand.  I just did a search for Confederate Flag and images of it came up on Google.  What gives?

Im not replying to your "fake" claims. Its just some of the ones I found, I could of posted 100s more if I had time. The point was its a valid concern and that its happening.



Cool on Bo! lol



Images will appear, but you cant buy one. All of the shopping links were blocked. Click the shopping tab and then come back to me after your jaw drops  

[Blazor]

WAIT WAIT .... There's an alternative



Bing is "the 2nd largest search engine"   ac_dance





OOPs, that's Gates

The one I used to find those links was Yandex, Russia's google. I HATE bing lol.

[RW]

I met Bo Duke IRL, eh?  :D



I don't understand.  I just did a search for Confederate Flag and images of it came up on Google.  What gives?

Im not replying to your "fake" claims. Its just some of the ones I found, I could of posted 100s more if I had time. The point was its a valid concern and that its happening.



Cool on Bo! lol



Images will appear, but you cant buy one. All of the shopping links were blocked. Click the shopping tab and then come back to me after your jaw drops  

Kk I'll check it out but if that's the case, it's ridiculous.



Sorry but your sources are garbage.  I bet you could dig up tons of irrelevant crap but please spare me.  For one, I know first hand how hard Google fights de-indexing content.  Their business model is all about audience.