News:

SMF - Just Installed!

 

The best topic

*

Replies: 11537
Total votes: : 5

Last post: Today at 12:47:20 PM
Re: Forum gossip thread by Trump’s Niece

A

The border wall and other large infrastructure projects

Started by Anonymous, January 14, 2019, 11:58:38 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 2 Window Lickers are viewing this topic.

Anonymous

First of all, I am not sold on a physical barrier slowing down the flow of people, and contraband. But, here's how a wall would stack up against other infrastructure  projects.



By Michelle Malkin



Profligate politicians have never met a multi-billion-dollar infrastructure project they didn't like — except when it comes to U.S. President Donald Trump's border wall. Think about it. Boston's Big Dig black hole, the nation's most expensive highway project, burned through US$25 billion and was plagued by deadly engineering incompetence, endless cost overruns, leaks, lawsuits and debt.



California's high-speed rail boondoggle is a $100-billion bullet train to nowhere. Gov. Jerry "Moonbeam" Brown promised a 2020 completion date for the miracle transportation system. The latest estimates predict it won't open until at least 2033, and the costs keep rising.



Seattle's ill-fated Alaskan Way Viaduct replacement topped out at $4 billion in local, state and federal funds for a two-mile bored road tunnel that will finally open next month — nearly four years behind schedule and hundreds of millions of dollars over budget.



What the Big Dig, bullet train boondoggle and Seattle squander all have in common is that political elites, lobbyists and corporate heavy-hitters trampled over grassroots citizen opposition to get their way. Too many government construction projects are built because these publicly subsidized gravy trains reward campaign donors, powerful public employee unions and assorted control freaks in the urban planning and transportation sectors.



Another glaring example? Across the country, voters have repeatedly rejected billion-dollar sports stadium and arena subsidies over the past 30 years — only to be sabotaged by bipartisan alliances overruling the will of the people. I used to run a watchdog website called "Porkwatch" filled with so many field-of-schemes case studies that I couldn't keep track of them anymore.



Then there are all the taxfunded highways, bridges, museums and other edifices glorifying Beltway swamp creatures. The infamous Democratic Sen. Robert Byrd of West Virginia steered billions of federal dollars back to his home state, where more than 50 government buildings bear his or his wife's name — not to mention an eponymous telescope, multiple libraries and "lifelong learning centres," wellness centres, industrial parks, community centres, gardens, interchanges, highways, expressways, bridges, locks and a dam. A bas-relief sculpture of the alpha porker greets visitors at the Byrd dam, deemed unnecessary by locals.



Not to be outdone, GOP Sen. Mitch Mcconnell has his own park; former Democratic Sen. John Dingell has his own transit centre; the late Democratic Sen. Frank Lautenberg has his own rail station; tax cheat Democratic Rep. Charlie Rangel has his own tax-funded "Charles B. Rangel Center for Public Service" at the City College of New York; and the recently retired powerbroker Democratic Sen. Harry Reid sponsored billions of dollars in egotistical earmarks, including several million for a "research and technology park" named after him.



Was there a swell of grassroots support for all these vanity projects? Was there overwhelming demand for the 10,000th long and windy road named after some blowhard incumbent hack?



Wouldn't it be refreshing, for once, for the U.S. federal government to prioritize infrastructure that serves the national interest over special interests? And how about dedicating and consecrating this project in the memory of the thousands of Americans and law-abiding immigrants who have sacrificed their lives for our security? We've already got Adopt-ahighway sponsors. Why not an Adopt-a-wall program?



Open borders academics and media propagandists keep lecturing that Americans don't want a wall. Yet, more than 325,000 citizens have raised $19.5 million in 22 days to fund the border that the Beltway obstinately refuses to fund.



President Trump's defining battle against the Beltway to fortify our borders — by concrete, steel, increased manpower, electronic surveillance, all of it — isn't just about fulfilling a campaign promise. The wall is a necessary monument to sovereignty in a nation clogged with billions of dollars of worthless political monuments to Me, Me, Me.

Anonymous

I don't know what to think of a continuous man made made barrier across the American Southern border..



I don't believe it will ever be built.

Anonymous

Quote from: "Fashionista"I don't know what to think of a continuous man made made barrier across the American Southern border..



I don't believe it will ever be built.

It will slow down the flow of illegal aliens and drugs. But, I don't have any confidence it will be built either.

Odinson

They could also build a shallow canal right next to the wall so that tunnels would get flooded..

Anonymous

Quote from: "Odinson"They could also build a shallow canal right next to the wall so that tunnels would get flooded..

How much would that cost?

Thiel

More Americans are blaming Trump rather than the Democratic congress for the shutdown, so I do not see congress making any deal with the president.
gay, conservative and proud

Odinson

Quote from: "Fashionista"
Quote from: "Odinson"They could also build a shallow canal right next to the wall so that tunnels would get flooded..

How much would that cost?


I´m using the Panama canal cost as reference..







562 billion dollars to build a similar canal for 3145 kilometres.

Thiel

Quote from: "Odinson"
Quote from: "Fashionista"
Quote from: "Odinson"They could also build a shallow canal right next to the wall so that tunnels would get flooded..

How much would that cost?


I´m using the Panama canal cost as reference..







562 billion dollars to build a similar canal for 3145 kilometres.

Is that all.
gay, conservative and proud

Anonymous

Quote from: "Thiel"More Americans are blaming Trump rather than the Democratic congress for the shutdown, so I do not see congress making any deal with the president.

Does that surprise anyone. The media hates Trump.

Wazzzup

Quote from: "iron horse jockey"
Quote from: "Thiel"More Americans are blaming Trump rather than the Democratic congress for the shutdown, so I do not see congress making any deal with the president.

Does that surprise anyone. The media hates Trump.
No doubt the mainstream media is nothing but a constant anti-Trump campaign commercial running 24/7.



----

According to authorities in Israel the wall there works extremely well.



Israel says illegal immigration has been completely halted. According to The Jerusalem Post, illegal immigration dropped from 9,500 in the six months before the wall was completed to 36 -- and eventually to zero. And drug smuggling has been dramatically reduced, too.[/quote]
If it can work there, why not in the US?

Anonymous

Quote from: "Wazzzup"
Quote from: "iron horse jockey"
Quote from: "Thiel"More Americans are blaming Trump rather than the Democratic congress for the shutdown, so I do not see congress making any deal with the president.

Does that surprise anyone. The media hates Trump.
No doubt the mainstream media is nothing but a constant anti-Trump campaign commercial running 24/7.



----

According to authorities in Israel the wall there works extremely well.



Israel says illegal immigration has been completely halted. According to The Jerusalem Post, illegal immigration dropped from 9,500 in the six months before the wall was completed to 36 -- and eventually to zero. And drug smuggling has been dramatically reduced, too.

If it can work there, why not in the US?[/quote]
I thought most of Israel's illegal migrants came from Africa.

Gaon

Quote from: "Fashionista"
Quote from: "Wazzzup"
Quote from: "iron horse jockey"
Quote from: "Thiel"More Americans are blaming Trump rather than the Democratic congress for the shutdown, so I do not see congress making any deal with the president.

Does that surprise anyone. The media hates Trump.
No doubt the mainstream media is nothing but a constant anti-Trump campaign commercial running 24/7.



----

According to authorities in Israel the wall there works extremely well.



Israel says illegal immigration has been completely halted. According to The Jerusalem Post, illegal immigration dropped from 9,500 in the six months before the wall was completed to 36 -- and eventually to zero. And drug smuggling has been dramatically reduced, too.

If it can work there, why not in the US?

I thought most of Israel's illegal migrants came from Africa.[/quote]
A lot are from Eritrea and Sudan who entered Israel through Egypt.. Some are from the Philippines, China, Romania, Russia and Georgia who overstayed visas. The Netanyahu government is cracking down on illegals and deporting them.
The Russian Rock It

Anonymous

Each illegal alien costs the US taxpayer $70,000 or about seven times the cost of deporting them. If the wall stopped a conservative figure of 100,000 illegals it will have paid for itself in the first year.

Wazzzup

#13
Quote from: "Herman"Each illegal alien costs the US taxpayer $70,000 or about seven times the cost of deporting them. If the wall stopped a conservative figure of 100,000 illegals it will have paid for itself in the first year.
I think its more than worth a gamble to find out.  At worst it will be 20 billion wasted (which I doubt, the wall should have, at the very least, some effectiveness.)   In US government terms 20 billion is nothing.   Especially compared to the $22 trillion spent on anti-poverty programs over the last 50 years with little or nothing to show for it.



I think what you said is correct, the wall could very well pay for itself.  I hope we get to find out.

Anonymous

Quote from: "Wazzzup"
Quote from: "Herman"Each illegal alien costs the US taxpayer $70,000 or about seven times the cost of deporting them. If the wall stopped a conservative figure of 100,000 illegals it will have paid for itself in the first year.
I think its more than worth a gamble to find out.  At worst it will be 20 billion wasted (which I doubt, the wall should have, at the very least, some effectiveness.)   In US government terms 20 billion is nothing.   Especially compared to the $22 trillion spent on anti-poverty programs over the last 50 years with little or nothing to show for it.

Like the op said, California wasted a lot more than that.