SG bans Caskur.

[Rotwang]

Brawl Hall hasn't been around in almost going on a decade, and this mentally unhinged idiot saved a photo of an underaged child to post on an adult forum.



For those of you in the "one of us" crowd, let that sink in.

Freud took a screen grab of me over 15 years ago during a chat, in the hope that I would fall for his troll.



You're in his cheer squad, corky.



Ask him why he still has it?



Spare us your hypocritical bullshit, sunshine. Some of us have been around a LOT longer than you.

[Biggie Smiles]

I have seen said chopped photograph.



It is not remotely pornographic. It may be argued it's in poor taste...but the last people to complain of using child molestation as flame fuel are these two idiots from SG. Freud's been doing it for years, and they get a good laugh out of it.



Posting pictures of children is questionable at any time...but unless it conforms to offensive standards, most sites don't specifically prohibit it. The image in question was not sexually explicit. That said, if it were posted here, I suspect admins would ask for it to be removed. But this is not a flame forum.



These two chattering gibbons are talking out of their crap canals.



As to Freud being the "victim" of using children as troll fuel, only one thing needs to be said; live by the sword...die by the sword.

POST REMOVED DUE TO BREACH OF RULES.

[Rotwang]

You've been provided the rule of this forum you've breached again.



You will note that the Admins have declared that forum rules still apply in F&F.



It seems you're intent on baiting.

[Anonymous]

What a NICE bunch of assholes they are.



Why members here feel the need to contribute to that cesspool of spite and malignancy is beyond my understanding.



It's not even a flame forum. It's a congregation of cowardly keyboard heroes that get their kicks from malice and torment.



Caskur is one of ours. Stand by her and stay out of that shithole.

What is Stomping Groundz?

[Biggie Smiles]

You've been provided the rule of this forum you've breached again.



You will note that the Admins have declared that forum rules still apply in F&F.



It seems you're intent on baiting.

Piss off cry baby. You're talking shit and you're gonna get shit talked back.



I'll tell you 10 more fucking times what I know about your past.



And what? You gonna tear up and go piss in a litter box?

[Anonymous]

Brawl Hall hasn't been around in almost going on a decade, and this mentally unhinged idiot saved a photo of an underaged child to post on an adult forum.



For those of you in the "one of us" crowd, let that sink in.

Freud took a screen grab of me over 15 years ago during a chat, in the hope that I would fall for his troll.



You're in his cheer squad, corky.



Ask him why he still has it?



Spare us your hypocritical bullshit, sunshine. Some of us have been around a LOT longer than you.

What does that have to do with posting pictures of under aged children?

[Rotwang]

You gonna tear up and go piss in a litter box?

Oh, no.



I will apply the rules of the forum, just as you do over there.



However, I've been more than benevolent in that you've been politely warned via PM, TWICE. You've even been provided a copy of the relevant rule. If you feel that rule is unfair, talk to the forum proprietor who makes the rules. Not me, sunshine.  



But you want to play "let's invoke panel abuse" games.



Sure, if that makes you feel better.

[Rotwang]

Brawl Hall hasn't been around in almost going on a decade, and this mentally unhinged idiot saved a photo of an underaged child to post on an adult forum.



For those of you in the "one of us" crowd, let that sink in.

Freud took a screen grab of me over 15 years ago during a chat, in the hope that I would fall for his troll.



You're in his cheer squad, corky.



Ask him why he still has it?



Spare us your hypocritical bullshit, sunshine. Some of us have been around a LOT longer than you.

What does that have to do with posting pictures of under aged children?

I have no idea.



The issue was the retention of photos from the distant past.



Should you need assistance comprehending posts, PM me with the relevant submission and I am happy to decode it for you.

[Anonymous]

Brawl Hall hasn't been around in almost going on a decade, and this mentally unhinged idiot saved a photo of an underaged child to post on an adult forum.



For those of you in the "one of us" crowd, let that sink in.

Freud took a screen grab of me over 15 years ago during a chat, in the hope that I would fall for his troll.



You're in his cheer squad, corky.



Ask him why he still has it?



Spare us your hypocritical bullshit, sunshine. Some of us have been around a LOT longer than you.

What does that have to do with posting pictures of under aged children?

I have no idea.



The issue was the retention of photos from the distant past.



Should you need assistance comprehending posts, PM me with the relevant submission and I am happy to decode it for you.

Well, I don't speak for anyone but myself.



Whatever chat logs were kept are irrelevant next to photos of under aged children.



The fact that there is a monster out here on these forums searching the internet for photos of forum members children is disturbing.



And no offense, dont think she hasn't done her dirty work on you, Rotty. She has. No matter what you wish to think.



I could care less either way. She has posted pictures of my children online. She has gotten forums wiped off the net with her stupidity.



Do I want to see that here? No

You know what this games like, but there's people here who don't. They shouldn't have to deal with some unhinged nutjob going full blown idiot cuz they said something unflattering about one of her cooking photos.



I post in this section cuz I like the humor of many of the posters here and I don't have to worry do much if a little flaming happens. It's all in good fun.



To her it isn't. This is her reality and she proves it time and time again with her actions. She's a horrible human being who uses the sympathy of complete strangers online to gain leverage. It's despicable.



If she's such an angel, how come nobody defended her at SG?

Or Turd Fail?

Or Brawl Hall?



She was banned on all three forums. Who gets banned at friggin Brawl Hall?



She isn't a flamer. She isn't a troll, she's a piece of shit looking in the wrong areas of the internet for friends. And the only reason she's in this community is because every one above this one has banned her.



She's chemically unbalanced. She needs help. She's not going to get it on these forums and isn't intelligent enough to see that, or this rationally for herself. She's a bitter, elderly woman who cannot differentiate the difference between real life and an internet game.



Again, I only speak for myself. If learning the hard way is what it takes, so be it.

[Rotwang]

Well, thank you for that comprehensive analysis of your understanding of Caskur's personality.



But I wonder why you think the membership here is not aware of her standing in parts of your precious flaming community?



It seems repetitious yet necessary to remind you and your fellow agitators that this is not a flame forum. In here, she and everyone else is not surrounded by brick brained bucket mouths who get off on bullying, harassing and intimidating others for what they perversely believe is "fun".



Flaming stopped being fun decades ago. I guessed you missed that memo whilst you were undergoing intense potty training.



Now, I'll be the first to acknowledge that if you lie down with dogs, you get fleas, and consequently some people should think twice before immersing themselves in an environment such as yours. But we all know that the lure of flaming can be irresistible to persons of certain characteristics, even though the experience can be damaging and self destructive. Psychiatrists would have a field day psychoanalyzing afficionados of modern flame forums, yourself included. You are all fuckups with serious social adjustment issues.



But in this space, Caskur has assimilated not as a flamer, but as a contributor. We accept her, warts and all. She has caused NO harm here at all.



Yes, she's her own person and walks to the beat of a different drum, but that only makes her more valued. That, in turn, provides her no incentive to act in ways she may do surrounded by dumbshits.



So, thank you for your efforts to warn us of the hazards within, but we can get along quite nicely without the trolling distortions of trolls such as yourself and Joo. Quite nicely.



If the presence of Caskur concerns you to the degree you feel compelled to lecture us as above, my recommendation to you would be to fuck off and confine yourself to the bastion of bullshit and bastardry in which you clearly belong.



Don't forget to mention me in your next waffling exposition.

[Anonymous]

Some of us have been around a LOT longer than you.

Res ipsa loquitur.

[Bricktop]

I see no sign of negligence.

[Anonymous]

Did someone mention negligence?  I must have missed that in my perusal of this ever so tiring thread.



I did see people urging caskur's local fans to do some "due diligence" which I believe to be very sound advice, and I did see one of the two alts you're using in the same thread telling poofie he doesn't have the time in grade to be talking to either one of them.  



And while I might agree that talking to poofie is generally a waste of time, my agreement is based on his meth habit rather than on time in grade.

[BEnzo]

I think people who claim Caskur is "one of us" should really take a moment to think about what they are saying.





Cause, as can be seen in this very thread, by Caskur's logic, it is ok to watch child porn which was filmed in the 80's and 90's because the actors are no longer pre-teens.



Sick. What a filthy degenerate.

Why are you giving yourself airs? You took a woman with 3 underaged children into your house, used her up and thrrew her out 6 weeks later...



You're the filthy degenerate arsehole... bugger off.

Huh!? A woman and 3 kids?

https://images.gr-assets.com/hostedimages/1380222758ra/668597.gif">

Omg that's funny-

[Bricktop]

"In the common law of torts, res ipsa loquitur (Latin for "the thing speaks for itself") is a doctrine that infers negligence from the very nature of an accident or injury in the absence of direct evidence on how any defendant behaved. Although modern formulations differ by jurisdiction, common law originally stated that the accident must satisfy the necessary elements of negligence: duty, breach of duty, causation, and injury. In res ipsa loquitur, the elements of duty of care, breach, and causation are inferred from an injury that does not ordinarily occur without negligence. "



Yet you seem keen to contribute to this "ever so tiring" thread.



I'm disinterested in the cause of Poofers mental diminution. However, I do believe that members here should clearly indicate that they hold no interest in the deluded ramblings and cross forum harassment perpetrated by this doltish clown.