My Ex is communicating with me tonight...

[Anonymous]

...bear in mind that I don't "want her back" for various reasons, but mainly because I will not risk 1/2 of my new house/property ever being taken away from me in some Kangaroo Court of Divorce law...



That said, it's nice to communicate with real people sometimes.

[Anonymous]

...bear in mind that I don't "want her back" for various reasons, but mainly because I will not risk 1/2 of my new house/property ever being taken away from me in some Kangaroo Court of Divorce law...



That said, it's nice to communicate with real people sometimes.

She's only communicating with you because she's found out you have bought a house and she wants part of it. Beware

[Frood]

Why are you talking to yourself, Mel-Mel?

[Anonymous]

He needs someone to listen to him.

[Anonymous]

Joe will be around to cock sniff soon.

[Anonymous]

Why are you talking to yourself, Mel-Mel?

The only one that talks to himself is you fraud

[Frood]

No YUO!

[Anonymous]

Fraternising with exes is a bad idea 95% of the time, they're exes for a reason.

[Biggie Smiles]

...bear in mind that I don't "want her back" for various reasons, but mainly because I will not risk 1/2 of my new house/property ever being taken away from me in some Kangaroo Court of Divorce law...



That said, it's nice to communicate with real people sometimes.

Is Canada law seriously that fucked up that the whole concept of separate property ie: premarital assets does not exist?



I mean damn, even heathen strongholds like new york where cavemen are responsible for authoring legislation understand that much.

[Odinson]

[Odinson]

That Fashies ex-husband..



She is like the female praying mantis.





Cops have been trying to get her for fraud for years..

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Mel, I'm married. Will you and Scouse stop begging me to sit on ur faces.

[Anonymous]

Is Canada law seriously that fucked up that the whole concept of separate property ie: premarital assets does not exist?



I mean damn, even heathen strongholds like new york where cavemen are responsible for authoring legislation understand that much.

Often I joke, but since you asked an honest question, I will give you an honest answer...



First off, it depends on the Province that you live in, but only if you have a pre-nup.  Pre-nups are valid in most Provinces, but not all.  Ontario, for instance, does NOT recognize a pre-nup, whereas BC does.



That said, the courts are generally fair with asset disposition here.  The REAL problem is always this:  Female decided to leave male.  Male earns $100,000/year.  Female has never done anything.



So when the female decides to bounce up and down on another cock, and initiate a divorce, her "lifestyle" will be impacted.



This is the problem in Canada...  Now the male will be expected to pay her, from his income, a percentage of his regular earnings for many years.



This is an attempt to keep her "lifestyle" similar to the one that she had, even though she didn't earn a penny.



I have seen judgements go up to almost 50% of income, to be paid to the female.



These judgements can last for decades.



It is one reason why, I don't want anyone else in my house but myself.



Or if I do, I draft up a rental agreement or a pre-nup.  I will NOT lose everything because I invited a female inside.



Talk to a lawyer, as rules and regs change from Province to Province, and from State to State.

[Anonymous]

Basically if you earn money, and she does not, you'll have to babysit her for years, even if she initiated a divorce simply because she wanted to bounce up and down on Tyrone's black dick, instead of being a proper wife and tending to her husband, household, and kids.