Democrats Are Just ‘Dumber Republicans’

[Anonymous]

Political Donor Who Cozied Up To Biden Is Sentenced To 12 Years In Prison

https://dailycaller.com/2021/02/19/imaad-zuberi-biden-prison-sri-lanka-donald-trump-barack-obama-foreign-agent/?utm_source=piano&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=2360&pnespid=lecyteNVBwyNhaP90fWZ_frJd_5ssf_9f8O64EVC">https://dailycaller.com/2021/02/19/imaa ... _9f8O64EVC">https://dailycaller.com/2021/02/19/imaad-zuberi-biden-prison-sri-lanka-donald-trump-barack-obama-foreign-agent/?utm_source=piano&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=2360&pnespid=lecyteNVBwyNhaP90fWZ_frJd_5ssf_9f8O64EVC



A venture capitalist who 'Team Biden' sought to develop as a potential donor was sentenced to 12 years in prison on Thursday on a slew of federal charges, including illegal foreign lobbying.



Imaad Zuberi cultivated ties to the highest levels of the U.S. government and met with Joe Biden and Barack Obama during their administration.



A longtime adviser to Joe Biden urged Hunter Biden in 2012 to stay in contact with Zuberi in order to bring him 'a little closer to Team Biden.'



Zuberi lobbied for the Sri Lankan government.

[Anonymous]

https://scontent.fyxd1-1.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/156213630_10222968661223849_6328483065394985781_n.jpg?_nc_cat=103&ccb=3&_nc_sid=8bfeb9&_nc_ohc=5vCbyPF2yGAAX-dC4dC&_nc_ht=scontent.fyxd1-1.fna&oh=ca1615a25c776cd35174df76441b2455&oe=6068D5A8">

[Anonymous]

ac_lmfao  ac_lmfao



Obama reportedly said Pete Buttigieg couldn't win presidency because 'he's gay' and 'short'

https://www.theblaze.com/news/obama-buttigieg-gay-short?utm_source=theblaze-breaking&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=20210305Trending-AbbottSocialMediaCensorship&utm_term=ACTIVE%20LIST%20-%20TheBlaze%20Breaking%20News">https://www.theblaze.com/news/obama-but ... ing%20News">https://www.theblaze.com/news/obama-buttigieg-gay-short?utm_source=theblaze-breaking&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=20210305Trending-AbbottSocialMediaCensorship&utm_term=ACTIVE%20LIST%20-%20TheBlaze%20Breaking%20News



In October 2019, former President Barack Obama reportedly told a group of wealthy black donors that former South Bend, Indiana, Mayor Pete Buttigieg didn't stand a chance to win the presidency because "he's gay" and "short."



Details of the New York City fundraising event at which Obama allegedly made the controversial remarks are spelled out in a new book about the 2020 presidential election called, "Lucky: How Joe Biden Barely Won the Presidency," co-authored by The Hill's Amie Parnes and NBC's Jonathan Allen.

[Anonymous]

https://scontent.fyxe2-1.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/158452096_10157927498315869_5347621998418845740_n.jpg?_nc_cat=111&ccb=1-3&_nc_sid=730e14&_nc_ohc=cmCJIrh2PWoAX8ahiV6&_nc_ht=scontent.fyxe2-1.fna&oh=c1456c4e37cd721c62177e87111ea924&oe=606C848A">

[Anonymous]

Did old Nancy commit a crime.



Judicial Watch Sues to Get Content of Pelosi's Call With Gen. Milley

https://conservativebrief.com/sues-to-get-content-36515/?utm_source=CB&utm_medium=The%20Conservative%20Standard&fbclid=IwAR3tF5840vc-sq3JuH1LlZwWIo1E-MqxkyUOmJ0CdXypWuf5RyEnMX5rcek">https://conservativebrief.com/sues-to-g ... yEnMX5rcek">https://conservativebrief.com/sues-to-get-content-36515/?utm_source=CB&utm_medium=The%20Conservative%20Standard&fbclid=IwAR3tF5840vc-sq3JuH1LlZwWIo1E-MqxkyUOmJ0CdXypWuf5RyEnMX5rcek



Legal watchdog organization Judicial Watch has filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit to gain access to the contents of a phone call in January between House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman U.S. Army Gen. Mark Milley.



Judicial Watch announced the lawsuit earlier this week, noting that the call between the California Democrat and the country's top military officer to discuss the authorities of a current president — in this case Donald Trump — sets a "dangerous precedent" that could impact future commanders-in-chief.



The organization said it had already attempted to discover the contents of the Jan. 8 call in a request to the Defense Department on Jan. 11 but has not heard back from the Pentagon.



Shortly after the phone call with Milley, which came two days after the Jan. 6 Capitol riot, Pelosi discussed the intent of her call in a communique to congressional Democrats.



"This morning, I spoke to the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Mark Milley to discuss available precautions for preventing an unstable president from initiating military hostilities or accessing the launch codes and ordering a nuclear strike," Pelosi wrote in her letter.



"The situation of this unhinged President could not be more dangerous, and we must do everything that we can to protect the American people from his unbalanced assault on our country and our democracy," she added.





"As you know, there is growing momentum around the invocation of the 25th Amendment, which would allow the Vice President and a majority of the Cabinet to remove the President for his incitement of insurrection and the danger he still poses," Pelosi added.



"Yesterday, Leader Schumer and I placed a call with Vice President Pence, and we still hope to hear from him as soon as possible with a positive answer as to whether he and the Cabinet will honor their oath to the Constitution and the American people," she continued.



Without question, the phone call to the Pentagon chief to relieve Trump of his nuclear codes is unprecedented in the modern era, not to mention completely inappropriate considering Milley had no authority whatsoever to do so or negate Trump's role as commander-in-chief any more than he can now do so regarding Joe Biden, who is obviously a candidate for the 25th Amendment.



And in fact, the Pentagon made that quite clear following the call.



"If Speaker Pelosi's description of her conversation with General Milley is true, it sets a dangerous precedent that could undermine the president's role as commander in chief and the separation of powers," Tom Fitton, president of Judicial Watch, said.



"Our new lawsuit aims to uncover the truth about the call," Fitton added.



The suit is requesting access to "any and all records" pertaining to the phone call, as well as "any and all additional records" of any communications they had between Nov. 1, 2020, two days before the election, and the present day.



It's not clear if Trump was ever actually denied access to the nuclear launch codes.



That said, on Jan. 13, the House — acting on the false claim that Trump 'incited an insurrection' — impeached Trump for the second time.



Judicial Watch filed the suit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, the organization said.

[Anonymous]

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi on Sunday defended the decision to allow the U.S. House to intervene in an Iowa election that had already been certified by the state.



Well, it was six votes," Pelosi told ABC's George Stephanopoulos during an appearance on "This Week."



"There was a razor close election," Stephanopoulos began. "The votes were counted, recounted, certified by the state, but there's a process that could lead to unseating the congresswoman, and Republicans are accusing you of hypocrisy."



Stephanopoulos went on to share a tweet from Republican Ohio Rep. Jim Jordan, who said, "Speaker Pelosi says she's open to unseating Republican Congresswoman Miller-Meeks. Translation: You're only allowed to object to an election if you're a Democrat."



"Why investigate an election that was certified by the state?" Stephanopoulos asked.

[Anonymous]

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi on Sunday defended the decision to allow the U.S. House to intervene in an Iowa election that had already been certified by the state.



Well, it was six votes," Pelosi told ABC's George Stephanopoulos during an appearance on "This Week."



"There was a razor close election," Stephanopoulos began. "The votes were counted, recounted, certified by the state, but there's a process that could lead to unseating the congresswoman, and Republicans are accusing you of hypocrisy."



Stephanopoulos went on to share a tweet from Republican Ohio Rep. Jim Jordan, who said, "Speaker Pelosi says she's open to unseating Republican Congresswoman Miller-Meeks. Translation: You're only allowed to object to an election if you're a Democrat."



"Why investigate an election that was certified by the state?" Stephanopoulos asked.

The Democrats are more corrupt than our Liberals.

[Anonymous]

You have got to be kidding me.



Meghan Markle is eyeing presidential campaign, talking to top Democrats



Just one week after Meghan Markle and Prince Harry went public with steamy allegations against the British royal family, new reports suggest that Markle could use notoriety from her interview with Oprah Winfrey to springboard a presidential campaign.



The Daily Mail reported Sunday that a senior figure in the Labour Party — whom the paper described as "a veteran of Tony Blair's Downing Street administration with strong links to Washington" — said Markle is networking with top Democrats with the aim of building a future presidential campaign and fundraising apparatus.



"The Blairite, internationalist and Democratic party networks are buzzing with talk about Meghan's political ambitions and potential backers," the source said.



The source further explained that Markle is looking to run as early as 2024, citing the fact that President Joe Biden will be 82 years old by then, according to the Daily Mail.



However, Markle would have to battle Democratic Party stars like Vice President Kamala Harris if she wants a legitimate shot at the White House.



What happened before?

After Markle and Prince Harry urged Americans to "reject hate speech" and participate in the 2020 election, Vanity Fair reported last year that Markle has political ambitions that include the White House.

https://www.theblaze.com/news/report-meghan-markle-eyeing-presidential-campaign?utm_source=theblaze-dailyAM&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Daily-Newsletter__AM%202021-03-15&utm_term=ACTIVE%20LIST%20-%20TheBlaze%20Daily%20AM">https://www.theblaze.com/news/report-me ... Daily%20AM">https://www.theblaze.com/news/report-meghan-markle-eyeing-presidential-campaign?utm_source=theblaze-dailyAM&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Daily-Newsletter__AM%202021-03-15&utm_term=ACTIVE%20LIST%20-%20TheBlaze%20Daily%20AM

[cc]

 ac_blush



That's a combination of funny and embarrassing

[Anonymous]

You have got to be kidding me.



Meghan Markle is eyeing presidential campaign, talking to top Democrats



Just one week after Meghan Markle and Prince Harry went public with steamy allegations against the British royal family, new reports suggest that Markle could use notoriety from her interview with Oprah Winfrey to springboard a presidential campaign.



The Daily Mail reported Sunday that a senior figure in the Labour Party — whom the paper described as "a veteran of Tony Blair's Downing Street administration with strong links to Washington" — said Markle is networking with top Democrats with the aim of building a future presidential campaign and fundraising apparatus.



"The Blairite, internationalist and Democratic party networks are buzzing with talk about Meghan's political ambitions and potential backers," the source said.



The source further explained that Markle is looking to run as early as 2024, citing the fact that President Joe Biden will be 82 years old by then, according to the Daily Mail.



However, Markle would have to battle Democratic Party stars like Vice President Kamala Harris if she wants a legitimate shot at the White House.



What happened before?

After Markle and Prince Harry urged Americans to "reject hate speech" and participate in the 2020 election, Vanity Fair reported last year that Markle has political ambitions that include the White House.

https://www.theblaze.com/news/report-meghan-markle-eyeing-presidential-campaign?utm_source=theblaze-dailyAM&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Daily-Newsletter__AM%202021-03-15&utm_term=ACTIVE%20LIST%20-%20TheBlaze%20Daily%20AM">https://www.theblaze.com/news/report-me ... Daily%20AM">https://www.theblaze.com/news/report-meghan-markle-eyeing-presidential-campaign?utm_source=theblaze-dailyAM&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Daily-Newsletter__AM%202021-03-15&utm_term=ACTIVE%20LIST%20-%20TheBlaze%20Daily%20AM

This has to be a joke.

[Anonymous]

That would be lovely.

  ac_hithere

[Anonymous]

Obviously their bans of posts and even users got Hiden elected in fact, despite a past of stupid legislation & crooked reputation  and a then present of hidin



Without them we'd be looking at a very different US and in fact different world



That kind of power is killing this world

You mad, bro?

 

[Anonymous]

That would be lovely.

  ac_hithere

You'd vote for Stewie Griffin.

[Anonymous]

That would be lovely.

  ac_hithere

You'd vote for Stewie Griffin.

Edweird could mix the oil on his face with food colouring and mark an X on a ballot.

[Anonymous]

That would be lovely.

  ac_hithere

You'd vote for Stewie Griffin.

Edweird could mix the oil on his face with food colouring and mark an X on a ballot.

He should have seen a dermatologist 30 years ago.