I doubt the effectiveness of vaccines-convince me otherwise without stupid memes and videos

[Frood]

I am 100 percent in favour of vaccine mandates. Employers have a duty to provide safe workplaces.

I'm 100 percent in favour of a you getting anally raped by a donkey mandate. You need to be tied up and violated until the stupid is fucked out of your gourd and arse...

[Bricktop]

WTF is that??



Is that the best you can offer a civil exchange of views?



Fuxake, boy. Did you ever leave Brawl Hall?

[Anonymous]

I found this from the CBC..



It doesn't clear up much.



Companies are implementing vaccine mandates. Can employees reject them?



Federal and provincial governments, private businesses as well as Canada's biggest banks have in recent weeks announced plans to implement mandatory vaccination policies for many of their returning staff.



These vaccine mandates require their employees to be vaccinated against COVID-19. But do employers have the right to impose such mandates? What if employees refuse?



That will likely depend on the particular circumstances that an employer and employee find themselves in, says Toronto-based employment lawyer Alex Lucifero. And the law will differ, he says, based upon a number of factors — for example, the particular industry, or whether the employees are unionized.



What's important for people to understand, says constitutional expert Wayne MacKay, professor emeritus of law at Dalhousie University, is that the Charter of Rights and Freedoms only applies to government action. That means, when it comes to vaccine mandates, the charter only applies for government workers refusing such a decree.



"It doesn't apply to private businesses or [a] private individual's actions," he said. "Statute law does, privacy laws, human rights codes, those kinds of things.  But only government action is restricted by the charter."



What charter rights might apply to vaccine mandates?

There are potentially at least three sections of the charter that could be used by a government employee to challenge a vaccine mandate, including Section 7 — the right to life, liberty and security of the person.



That could be cited to challenge "a policy that seems to coerce people into getting vaccinated," wrote University of B.C. law professor Debra Parkes and University of Ottawa law professor Carissima Mathen in a recent editorial.

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/vaccination-mandates-employees-rights-1.6142584">https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/vaccinat ... -1.6142584">https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/vaccination-mandates-employees-rights-1.6142584

[Frood]

WTF is that??



Is that the best you can offer a civil exchange of views?



Fuxake, boy. Did you ever leave Brawl Hall?

I'm not obligated to treat stupid authoritarian fuck sticks with dignity or respect.



I'd rather snuff them out with a pillow.

[Anonymous]

I found this from the CBC..



It doesn't clear up much.



Companies are implementing vaccine mandates. Can employees reject them?



Federal and provincial governments, private businesses as well as Canada's biggest banks have in recent weeks announced plans to implement mandatory vaccination policies for many of their returning staff.



These vaccine mandates require their employees to be vaccinated against COVID-19. But do employers have the right to impose such mandates? What if employees refuse?



That will likely depend on the particular circumstances that an employer and employee find themselves in, says Toronto-based employment lawyer Alex Lucifero. And the law will differ, he says, based upon a number of factors — for example, the particular industry, or whether the employees are unionized.



What's important for people to understand, says constitutional expert Wayne MacKay, professor emeritus of law at Dalhousie University, is that the Charter of Rights and Freedoms only applies to government action. That means, when it comes to vaccine mandates, the charter only applies for government workers refusing such a decree.



"It doesn't apply to private businesses or [a] private individual's actions," he said. "Statute law does, privacy laws, human rights codes, those kinds of things.  But only government action is restricted by the charter."



What charter rights might apply to vaccine mandates?

There are potentially at least three sections of the charter that could be used by a government employee to challenge a vaccine mandate, including Section 7 — the right to life, liberty and security of the person.



That could be cited to challenge "a policy that seems to coerce people into getting vaccinated," wrote University of B.C. law professor Debra Parkes and University of Ottawa law professor Carissima Mathen in a recent editorial.

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/vaccination-mandates-employees-rights-1.6142584">https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/vaccinat ... -1.6142584">https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/vaccination-mandates-employees-rights-1.6142584

The CBC will only quote lawyers who support vaccine mandates.

[Anonymous]

And there is this.



In Canada, an employer can't automatically impose a vaccine mandate for non-unionized employees. Any policy that attempts to force employees to fully vaccinate against COVID-19 may be illegal due to discrimination based on perceived disability, and a violation of their human rights.

https://stlawyers.ca/coronavirus-knowledge-centre/employer-mandatory-vaccinations/">https://stlawyers.ca/coronavirus-knowle ... cinations/">https://stlawyers.ca/coronavirus-knowledge-centre/employer-mandatory-vaccinations/

[cc]

I am 100 percent in favour of vaccine mandates. Employers have a duty to provide safe workplaces.

I'm 100 percent in favour of a you getting .----------- a donkey mandate. You need to be tied up and violated until the stupid is f-----------------------..

Your homoerotic underpinning aside, that is not acceptable behavior

[Anonymous]

And there is this.



In Canada, an employer can't automatically impose a vaccine mandate for non-unionized employees. Any policy that attempts to force employees to fully vaccinate against COVID-19 may be illegal due to discrimination based on perceived disability, and a violation of their human rights.

https://stlawyers.ca/coronavirus-knowledge-centre/employer-mandatory-vaccinations/">https://stlawyers.ca/coronavirus-knowle ... cinations/">https://stlawyers.ca/coronavirus-knowledge-centre/employer-mandatory-vaccinations/

If there is a wave of terminations, the courts will be tied up for years.

[Bricktop]

WTF is that??



Is that the best you can offer a civil exchange of views?



Fuxake, boy. Did you ever leave Brawl Hall?

I'm not obligated to treat stupid authoritarian fuck sticks with dignity or respect.



I'd rather snuff them out with a pillow.

Man, you're a real asset to intelligent discourse, aintcha.



 

[Anonymous]

And there is this.



In Canada, an employer can't automatically impose a vaccine mandate for non-unionized employees. Any policy that attempts to force employees to fully vaccinate against COVID-19 may be illegal due to discrimination based on perceived disability, and a violation of their human rights.

https://stlawyers.ca/coronavirus-knowledge-centre/employer-mandatory-vaccinations/">https://stlawyers.ca/coronavirus-knowle ... cinations/">https://stlawyers.ca/coronavirus-knowledge-centre/employer-mandatory-vaccinations/

If there is a wave of terminations, the courts will be tied up for years.

We'll see if there are mass terminations.

[Anonymous]

And there is this.



In Canada, an employer can't automatically impose a vaccine mandate for non-unionized employees. Any policy that attempts to force employees to fully vaccinate against COVID-19 may be illegal due to discrimination based on perceived disability, and a violation of their human rights.

https://stlawyers.ca/coronavirus-knowledge-centre/employer-mandatory-vaccinations/">https://stlawyers.ca/coronavirus-knowle ... cinations/">https://stlawyers.ca/coronavirus-knowledge-centre/employer-mandatory-vaccinations/

If there is a wave of terminations, the courts will be tied up for years.

We'll see if there are mass terminations.

I guess we will find out more next month. That seems to be the deadline for a lot of companies.

[Frood]

WTF is that??



Is that the best you can offer a civil exchange of views?



Fuxake, boy. Did you ever leave Brawl Hall?

I'm not obligated to treat stupid authoritarian fuck sticks with dignity or respect.



I'd rather snuff them out with a pillow.

Man, you're a real asset to intelligent discourse, aintcha.



 

There is no legitimate discourse to be engaged in with a douchebag.....only contempt and derision.

[Anonymous]

WTF is that??



Is that the best you can offer a civil exchange of views?



Fuxake, boy. Did you ever leave Brawl Hall?

I'm not obligated to treat stupid authoritarian fuck sticks with dignity or respect.



I'd rather snuff them out with a pillow.

Man, you're a real asset to intelligent discourse, aintcha.



 

There is no legitimate discourse to be engaged in with a douchebag.....only contempt and derision.

Nobody here fits that description.

[cc]

WTF is that??



Is that the best you can offer a civil exchange of views?



Fuxake, boy. Did you ever leave Brawl Hall?

I'm not obligated to treat stupid authoritarian fuck sticks with dignity or respect.



I'd rather snuff them out with a pillow.

Man, you're a real asset to intelligent discourse, aintcha.



 

There is no legitimate discourse to be engaged in with a douchebag.....only contempt and derision.

Nobody here fits that description.

hmmmm .. reading the above, there is  one who could be considered to the honorary title  ac_smile .. and well earned at that

[Blazor]

If you still doubt if it works, let me help reinforce that with 3 words.....



Obama's Birthday Party.