News:

SMF - Just Installed!

 

The best topic

*

Replies: 11487
Total votes: : 5

Last post: Today at 12:04:54 PM
Re: Forum gossip thread by deport_liberals

avatar_Blazor

Politics/Religion Consolidated Megathread Extravaganza

Started by Blazor, November 15, 2022, 12:42:03 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 10 Window Lickers are viewing this topic.


Anonymous

Quote from: Herman post_id=499015 time=1682670397 user_id=3396
Today is a sad day for free speech in Canada.



With the official passage of Bill C-11, which aims to censor and regulate the internet through the manipulation of social media algorithms (including Twitter), Canadians can no longer be confident that the content they see on social media is being independently distributed and ranked according to their interests and activity.



Instead, this bill, which was/is supported by both the NDP and Liberals, gives the government (through the CRTC) the power to compel certain content from "preferred distributors" (like the CBC) to the top of Canadians' news feeds, "recommended videos" and "up next" playlists – and, by extension, to bury the rest.



In short, this is an attempt to control what Canadians think, by controlling what they see. To interfere and meddle in the marketplace of ideas in an effort to engineer cultural outcomes complimentary to the ideology they prefer.

Too little, too late. As usual. You honestly think a mad scramble for search engine results at this late stage is going to matter  as AI is in the process of making them redundant altogether? Ask yourself this; knowing how lazy people naturally tend to be, if they are faced with a choice of spending hours rooting about Google results for curated content or simply telling a chatbot to create and supply them with whatever they require inside of scant seconds... what do you imagine they'll default to?



That's right... Truedeaup is playing at being a neutered idiot, I think that much is clear. The technocracy has stooged him yet again. Shit, he hasn't even caught up on the whole VPN workaround, meaning anyone with a few dollars to spare a month can digitally hop the border for US's search results, tweets, YouTurds and Fecesboobed inteactions, bypassing Canadian restrictions entirely. More advanced users are cottoning on to alternative media sources like Rumble, Bitchute and Odysee, along with the ever growing parallel internet society that CBC would trash endlessly rather than admit to being as useless as the cunt trying (and failing) to push them to the head of the queue.



It's the wild west all over again and Truedeaup and his plantation owner mentality are powerless to prevent it. But only as long as you refuse to give them any quarter. That means finding work arounds for every leash they attempt to tie you down with, slipping their nooses at every turn while they wail impotently what cunts you all are for not being the obedient slaves to them that they wished you'd be.

Herman

Four embassies have been abandoned under Jim Crow Joe's watch.

Anonymous

Quote from: Herman post_id=499126 time=1682755827 user_id=3396
Four embassies have been abandoned under Jim Crow Joe's watch.

It's more damning that he's all but torpedoed the petrodollar. That's gonna totally fuck with economic activity of any country unfortunate enough to be using the Greenback as a reserve currency.

DKG

Quote from: Guest post_id=499137 time=1682760122
Quote from: Herman post_id=499126 time=1682755827 user_id=3396
Four embassies have been abandoned under Jim Crow Joe's watch.

It's more damning that he's all but torpedoed the petrodollar. That's gonna totally fuck with economic activity of any country unfortunate enough to be using the Greenback as a reserve currency.

His naive energy fantasies are dangerous.

Herman

A scathing report from the Wall Street Journal claims that numerous high-profile muckety mucks met with Jeffrey Epstein after he was convicted sex offender. A CIA director, leftist Noam Chomsky, Obama's White House counsel, and a Rothschild met with Epstein, according to a new report that cites the convicted pedophile's private calendar.



Epstein reportedly had three meetings with William Burns in 2014. At the time, Burns was deputy secretary of state before President Joe Biden appointed him as director of the Central Intelligence Agency in 2021. The WSJ exposé claimed that Burns first met Epstein in Washington, and then later visited the convicted pedophile's townhouse in Manhattan.

Herman

I went to Butthurt Fagtory to see who was pretending to be me. The piece of shit owner has it on lockdown again. I did see somebody using my handle as the newest member. It is probably some prog wanker.



Ah for Christ sake. Obviously, I wanted to post this in Forum Gossip. I will post it again there. Flea, can you delete this.

Herman

Republican presidential candidate Vivek Ramaswamy gave NBC News anchor Chuck Todd a basic lesson in biology on Sunday on the issue of biological sex.



During an interview on "Meet the Press," Todd questioned Ramaswamy on his position that affirming gender confusion in children and teenagers is not compassionate, but "cruelty."

https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=140&v=qpEP9MLtme4&embeds_euri=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.theblaze.com%2Fnews%2Fvivek-ramaswamy-chuck-todd-trans-ideology%3Futm_source%3Dtheblaze-breaking%26utm_medium%3Demail%26utm_campai&source_ve_path=Mjg2NjY&feature=emb_logo">https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_cont ... e=emb_logo">https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=140&v=qpEP9MLtme4&embeds_euri=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.theblaze.com%2Fnews%2Fvivek-ramaswamy-chuck-todd-trans-ideology%3Futm_source%3Dtheblaze-breaking%26utm_medium%3Demail%26utm_campai&source_ve_path=Mjg2NjY&feature=emb_logo

DKG

The Supreme Court will hear a case in the next term that could remove a significant amount of power from the federal government.



The case was brought by herring fishermen in New England, challenging the National Marine Fisheries Service's authority to force them to carry a monitor on their vessels who ensures the fishermen comply with federal regulations. Not only do fishermen not have a say in whether monitors are placed on their vessels, but they are forced to pay the monitor's salary.



The industry estimates the regulations reduce their profits by 20%.



The Supreme Court granted a writ of certiorari to answer the following question:



Whether the Court should overrule Chevron or at least clarify that statutory silence concerning controversial powers expressly but narrowly granted elsewhere in the statute does not constitute an ambiguity requiring deference to the agency.

The case, then, could gut the Chevron doctrine, established by the landmark Supreme Court case Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. in 1984.



"In Chevron, the Supreme Court set forth a legal test as to when the court should defer to the agency's answer or interpretation, holding that such judicial deference is appropriate where the agency's answer was not unreasonable, so long as Congress had not spoken directly to the precise issue at question," Cornell Law explains.



In layman's terms, the Chevron Doctrine significantly empowers the federal government because in the absence of explicit statutory language (for which Congress is responsible), the courts defer to the executive branch's "reasonable" statutory interpretation.



Unsurprisingly, those interpretations almost always favor the federal government, because the definition of "reasonable" has been stretched beyond reason.



The potential implications of Loper Bright cannot be ignored because the government stands to lose a significant amount of power. But as law professor Jonathan Adler explained, the Supreme Court is not likely to overrule Chevron altogether.



"t is more likely the Court merely takes the opportunity to narrow the doctrine and make clear that statutory silences and ambiguities should not be construed as grants of agency authority," Alder reacted.



Ironically, the case made it to the Supreme Court because the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals applied Chevron deference, ruling 2-1 that the government is justified in its interpretation of the Magnuson-Stevens Act. Thus, they ruled that the monitor program, which hamstrings herring fishermen, is legal.



Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, who served on the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals until last June, recused herself from the case.

https://www.theblaze.com/news/supreme-court-grants-review-chevron-doctrine-loper-bright?utm_source=theblaze-dailyAM&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Daily-Newsletter__AM%202023-05-02&utm_term=ACTIVE%20LIST%20-%20TheBlaze%20Daily%20AM">https://www.theblaze.com/news/supreme-c ... Daily%20AM">https://www.theblaze.com/news/supreme-court-grants-review-chevron-doctrine-loper-bright?utm_source=theblaze-dailyAM&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Daily-Newsletter__AM%202023-05-02&utm_term=ACTIVE%20LIST%20-%20TheBlaze%20Daily%20AM



This could be an interesting decision.

DKG

As the Biden administration's mortgage redistribution plan goes into effect, real estate industry leaders have signaled it's "one more boot on our neck" in the housing market.



Under new rules from the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) set to take effect May 1, borrowers with lower credit ratings and less money for a down payment will qualify for better mortgage rates than they otherwise would have, while those with higher ratings will pay increased fees.



According to a recent analysis from Bankrate, someone with a "below average" credit score of 640 seeking a $350,000 mortgage with 20% down paid $10,500 in fees before the new regulations. They will now pay $7,875.



Someone with a 740 credit score exploring the same deal paid $1,750 in fees before the FHFA's new rules, but now is expected to pay more at $3,062.

Lokmar

Quote from: DKG post_id=499485 time=1683039235 user_id=3390
As the Biden administration's mortgage redistribution plan goes into effect, real estate industry leaders have signaled it's "one more boot on our neck" in the housing market.



Under new rules from the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) set to take effect May 1, borrowers with lower credit ratings and less money for a down payment will qualify for better mortgage rates than they otherwise would have, while those with higher ratings will pay increased fees.



According to a recent analysis from Bankrate, someone with a "below average" credit score of 640 seeking a $350,000 mortgage with 20% down paid $10,500 in fees before the new regulations. They will now pay $7,875.



Someone with a 740 credit score exploring the same deal paid $1,750 in fees before the FHFA's new rules, but now is expected to pay more at $3,062.


I told my wife I'll keep 1 thing at a collection agency so I have a low credit score. She can have the high credit score. Hell, if we ever divorce, I can probably sue her for spousal support for all of eternity!!!  ac_toofunny

Herman

Quote from: DKG post_id=499485 time=1683039235 user_id=3390
As the Biden administration's mortgage redistribution plan goes into effect, real estate industry leaders have signaled it's "one more boot on our neck" in the housing market.



Under new rules from the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) set to take effect May 1, borrowers with lower credit ratings and less money for a down payment will qualify for better mortgage rates than they otherwise would have, while those with higher ratings will pay increased fees.



According to a recent analysis from Bankrate, someone with a "below average" credit score of 640 seeking a $350,000 mortgage with 20% down paid $10,500 in fees before the new regulations. They will now pay $7,875.



Someone with a 740 credit score exploring the same deal paid $1,750 in fees before the FHFA's new rules, but now is expected to pay more at $3,062.

This is war being waged on working folks by prog elites.

Herman

Hillary Clinton is coming to Ottawa to speak at the Liberal Party of Canada's national convention on Friday.



Hillary couldn't beat Donald Trump, a wild, undisciplined, first-timer in electoral politics, even with the state apparatus, the support of the main news media, a budget that would shame Croesus, and the backing of just about every major political force in the U.S.



The queen of failure in politics as a career does come to Ottawa with some utility for the present government. She could advise, for example, on what to do when a foundation in your family name becomes a topic of controversy. And how to stonewall — both Hillary and her husband have elevated the art of "stonewalling" to heights undreamed of, even in the darkest recesses of Richard Nixon's mind.



She could also be useful in underlining that scorn for the less "attractive" voters — less attractive to progressives, I mean — the "basket of deplorables," or in Trudeau's alternate phrasing, the "racists" and the "intolerables." On this side of politics, scorning some of the electorate, those not sharing the "enlightenment" of their betters, Mr. T. and Ms. C. have much to munch over.



Rex Murphy wrote this, not me.

Herman

Jim Crow Joe is the godfather of a criminal enterprise.



https://www.theblaze.com/news/republicans-subpoena-fbi-file-allegedly-detailing-how-biden-sold-us-policy-for-cash-as-part-of-criminal-scheme?utm_source=theblaze-dailyPM&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Daily-Newsletter__PM%202023-05-03&utm_term=ACTIVE%20LIST%20-%20TheBlaze%20Daily%20PM">https://www.theblaze.com/news/republica ... Daily%20PM">https://www.theblaze.com/news/republicans-subpoena-fbi-file-allegedly-detailing-how-biden-sold-us-policy-for-cash-as-part-of-criminal-scheme?utm_source=theblaze-dailyPM&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Daily-Newsletter__PM%202023-05-03&utm_term=ACTIVE%20LIST%20-%20TheBlaze%20Daily%20PM

The Biden Department of Justice and the FBI are reportedly in possession of a document that details a possible "criminal scheme"

involving then-Vice President Joe Biden's collusion with a foreign national.



According to a reportedly reputable whistleblower, the document in question allegedly provides specific details about how Biden did the bidding of a foreign national, delivering requested policy decisions in exchange for cash.



House Oversight Committee chairman James Comer (R-Ky.) and Republican Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) are now demanding that the FBI produce the record in question, having issued a subpoena to that effect.



The Republican duo penned a letter to FBI Director Christopher Wray and Attorney General Merrick Garland Wednesday, noting that on the basis of "legally protected and highly credible unclassified whistleblower disclosures ... it has come to our attention that the Department of Justice (DOJ) and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) possess an unclassified FD-1023 form."



An FD-1023 form is a document used by the FBI to record interviews with whistleblowers and other sources.



According to Comer and Grassley, the form contains "valuable, verifiable information" describing "an alleged criminal scheme involving then-Vice President Biden and a foreign national relating to the exchange of money for policy decisions."



In addition to a broad outline of impropriety, the record allegedly "includes a precise description of how the alleged criminal scheme was employed as well as its purpose."

https://twitter.com/GOPoversight/status/1653821776227344389?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1653821776227344389%7Ctwgr%5E73187ad8eaaac820063f84bab4ae102f7040f84b%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.theblaze.com%2Fnews%2Frepublicans-subpoena-fbi-file-allegedly-detailing-how-biden-sold-us-policy-for-cash-as-part-of-criminal-scheme">https://twitter.com/GOPoversight/status ... nal-scheme">https://twitter.com/GOPoversight/status/1653821776227344389?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1653821776227344389%7Ctwgr%5E73187ad8eaaac820063f84bab4ae102f7040f84b%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.theblaze.com%2Fnews%2Frepublicans-subpoena-fbi-file-allegedly-detailing-how-biden-sold-us-policy-for-cash-as-part-of-criminal-scheme

Herman

Fox News correspondent Peter Doocy confronted the Biden administration on Tuesday over its claim that illegal immigration has decreased by more than 90%.



The "more than 90%" claim received a lot of attention, but no follow-up at Monday's press briefing. So on Tuesday, Doocy took it upon himself to ask Jean-Pierre exactly from where she derived that figure.



"Where did that number come from?" he asked, noting that Customs and Border Protection says that illegal migration has increased compared to last year.



It's true, according to Fox News correspondent Bill Melugin, that immigration numbers from countries in the parolee program improved — but that improvement was offset by increasing migration from countries not in the program.



"There was a window of time earlier this year where encounters with Venezuelans, Nicaraguans, and Cubans did temporarily dip 90% after a policy change, but other countries, like China, shot up over 800%. Illegal crossings, including Venezuelans, back at peak highs now," Melugin explained.



Indeed, on the same day that Jean-Pierre claimed immigration had improved, the Border Patrol announced that more than 22,000 migrants had been apprehended in the previous 72 hours.







In fact, when Biden announced the parolee program about four months ago, Melugin predicted the Biden administration would use the program control the optics of the border crisis while simultaneously exacerbating it.