Kameltoe Harris

[Brent]

Still using Just For Men I see.

I agree about Harris. There is no meat on the bones. Trump has detailed ideas. Harris is asking for donations.

[JOE]

I think Kamala could win & be your next President Garraty_47 Garraty.

However if she does, it'll be a squeaker of an election that will leave the USA more divided than before.

An American President who wins the Electoral College with just 270-80 Electoral Votes is almost like a minority Prime Minister in Canada or Britain.

In other words it's a mandate but not a 100% endorsement from the American voter.

So she would be President over a divided country in an extremely divided time with a good swathe of the country solidly Red.

The current Democratic party reminds me of the one in the 1970s when you had Carter.

So you may have a brief period of liberal Democratic party rule in the 2020s before the USA makes quite possibly a hard tilt to the Right in the 2030s. What might facilitate this shift are declining economic conditions and fortunes of the average American.

[Thiel]

I think Kamala could win & be your next President Garraty_47 Garraty.

However if she does, it'll be a squeaker of an election that will leave the USA more divided than before.

An American President who wins the Electoral College with just 270-80 Electoral Votes is almost like a minority Prime Minister in Canada or Britain.

In other words it's a mandate but not a 100% endorsement from the American voter.

So she would be President over a divided country in an extremely divided time with a good swathe of the country solidly Red.

The current Democratic party reminds me of the one in the 1970s when you had Carter.

So you may have a brief period of liberal Democratic party rule in the 2020s before the USA makes quite possibly a hard tilt to the Right in the 2030s. What might facilitate this shift are declining economic conditions and fortunes of the average American.

Go read your comic books Sweetie. You are not adding anything to this discussion. it doesn't concern you anyway.

[Herman]

This editorial by Victor Davis Hanson explains that Kameltoe and Tampon Tim are the most extreme candidates ever to seek the highest elected office in the US.

Don't buy Kameltoe's flip flops on illegal immigration and fracking. She is and always will be an extremist at war with working folks. She will show her true colours and those of her handlers after she wins. Yes, Kameltoe will win.

Harris is utterly incapable of articulating a coherent thought without a teleprompter or a staged interview. Walz is a buffoon who, in his first speech as the nominee, screamed out the "couch" lie about JD Vance and then stupidly bragged of his falsehood.

Harris, until recently, was proud that she had been one of the most radical California politicians in memory. She ran such a hard-left, polarizing presidential bid against Biden in 2020 that she could not capture even a single Democrat delegate.

Now she has selected as her vice-president pick the most left-wing governor in the nation. Walz, during the long 2020 summer of rioting, allowed Black Lives Matter and Antifa to run amuck in Minnesota while his new partner Harris raised bail for those jailed for violence.


Walz, like Harris, has done his best to stop pipelines and curtail fossil fuels.

He once boasted that "Democrats go into depression" when they see electoral maps shaded in red, "but it's mostly rocks and cows that are in that red area."

Apparently, his advice for Democrats was just to win urban areas and not sweat alienating greater rural Minnesota regions where fewer voters live — a blueprint for their 2024 campaign.

That snark was an expansion of Obama's dismissal of rural Pennsylvanians as "clingers" and Hillary Clinton's trashing of the rural working class as "deplorables."

By selecting the hard-left Walz, Harris reminds the nation who runs the Democratic Party. It is preparing for a hard-left, neo-socialist administration — while it seeks to deceive the public for the next 90 days that Harris-Walz are temporary moderates.

Like the cognitively challenged Joe Biden in 2020, word-salad Harris won't be let out to campaign much by her wary handlers.

Instead, she will out-raise Trump, count on non-Election Day balloting, pose as a centrist and let her surrogates, like the blowhard Walz, brand Trump as a criminal extremist.

But if the current initial Harris-Walz flipping is embarrassing, their eventual post-November flopping back to the left will be shameless — and dangerous for the nation.

In 2025, under a Harris-Walz presidency, borders would again magically evaporate. Millions more illegal aliens would regroup and flood into the U.S.

Printing more trillions of dollars would spike more hyperinflation. Cutting defence would further encourage even more wars in Asia, Europe and the Middle East. More woke and DEI mandates would ensure more tribal disunity.

Harris-Walz would try fulfilling earlier promises to ban fracking and horizontal drilling, render the U.S. vulnerable to hostile foreign oil producers, distance the U.S. from Israel and out-appease Biden's coddling of Iran.

They would continue the crazy left-wing war on the Supreme Court and implement Biden's plan to neuter it.
But for now?

The Harris-Walz message is clear: "In order to run your country for the next four years, we must lie and deceive you for the next three months."

[Brent]

10 bills that expose Kamala's radical agenda against working Americans.

1.Harris cosponsored the Green New Deal in the Senate. This proposal, spearheaded by Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.), aims to "upgrade" nearly every home and business in the United States. It also mandates the creation of a new electricity grid, guarantees government jobs, establishes basic-income programs, imposes regulations to transform U.S. agriculture, and commits trillions to wind and solar development. Additionally, it requires the elimination of most of the fossil-fuel industry within 10 years.

All told, the Green New Deal would cost an estimated $92 trillion, making it one of the most expensive legislative proposals in history.

2. Climate Equity Act of 2020
Harris' Climate Equity Act would establish a Climate and Environmental Equity Office within the Congressional Budget Office. The new agency would be responsible for ensuring that far-left ideas about the alleged dangers of climate change are part of new legislation, regulations, and government investments related to any environmental or climate-change issue.

The bill would also require government agencies to publish biannually "a climate and environmental justice accountability agenda" and ensure that proposed regulations include an "environmental justice analysis" when that rule might have "a significant impact on a substantial number of residents within frontline communities."

3. Medicare for All Act of 2019
In 2019, Vermont's socialist Sen. Bernie Sanders (I) introduced legislation that would create a government-run universal health care system in the United States. The legislation would effectively eliminate the modern private health insurance system and force nearly all Americans to become dependent on government for their health care needs. Harris cosponsored the socialist health care plan and then offered her own version of government-run health care as part of her short-lived 2020 presidential campaign.

The Mercatus Center estimated the cost to taxpayers to cover Sanders' health care proposal would be more than $32 trillion over a single decade.

4. COVID-19 Bias and Anti-Racism Training Act of 2020
During the height of the COVID-19 hysteria, Harris sponsored legislation to fund radical "anti-racism training" programs for health care providers. It also would mandate that the Department of Health and Human Services "develop requirements for bias and anti-racism training that aligns with continuing education requirements of applicable state licensing bodies, such as medical boards."

5. Saving Our Street Act
In 2020, Harris sponsored legislation called the Saving Our Street Act, which was sold as a COVID-19 aid program for small businesses. Unlike many other aid programs, however, Harris' legislation would have required that the government "give priority to people of color, veterans, women-owned community businesses, and socially and economically disadvantaged individuals," an overtly discriminatory and almost certainly unconstitutional provision.

6. VoteSafe Act of 2020
Harris' VoteSafe Act would have forced all states and local jurisdictions to enact reforms in the 2020 election that would have significantly reduced election security. For example, the bill would have mandated nationwide "no-excuse" mail-in absentee voting, drop-off boxes for ballots, and online ballot requests. Although some states in 2020 ended up adopting some or all of these reforms, many did not.

7. Maternal CARE Act
The Maternal CARE Act, a bill sponsored by Harris in 2019, would provide government funding for "health-professional training programs for training that addresses implicit bias (e.g., racial bias) in the practice of obstetrics and gynecology."

The claim that some groups have implicit racial biases against others is a highly disputed concept developed and promoted by far-left academics, and it is often used by progressive and socialist politicians as a trojan horse to introduce other left-wing concepts into workplaces and schools.

8. DONE Act
Proposed by Harris in July 2019, the DONE Act would ban the Department of Homeland Security from building or expanding immigration detention facilities. Of course, without new or expanded facilities, government officials would need to deport or release into society many immigrants who come to America illegally. Since Harris opposes many forms of deportation, the only option remaining is to allow a seemingly unlimited number of immigrants who come to the United States illegally to travel freely throughout the country.

9. Environmental Justice for All Act
The Environmental Justice for All Act, sponsored by Harris, would establish "several environmental justice requirements, advisory bodies, and programs to address the disproportionate adverse human health or environmental effects of federal laws or programs on communities of color, low-income communities, or tribal and indigenous communities."

More specifically, it would prohibit "disparate impacts on the basis of race, color, or national origin as discrimination."

Under this radical proposal, a government program or law would be required to ensure that the "impacts" of its provisions result in equitable outcomes for racial groups. This is an impossibility without government deliberately favoring some demographics over others, because no law could ever naturally result in perfectly equitable outcomes for all groups of people.

10. Patsy T. Mink and Louise M. Slaughter Gender Equity in Education Act of 2018
Harris was one of only 13 cosponsors of the Patsy T. Mink and Louise M. Slaughter Gender Equity in Education Act of 2018. The legislation would create a new Office for Gender Equity within the Department of Education. Among other powers, the new office would "provide grants and perform activities to reduce or prevent discrimination, bias, harassment, or violence based on actual or perceived sex, sexual orientation, gender, gender identity, pregnancy, childbirth, or related medical conditions or stereotypes in all areas of education."

Although some of the bill's goals are admirable, the bill's focus on tackling "implicit bias" and provisions related to gender identity, among other components, would open the floodgates for federal bureaucrats to inject far-reaching, left-wing goals into local school districts. This would likely include policies that would force nearly all public schools to allow biological males to compete in girls' sports.

[caskur]

Go read your comic books Sweetie. You are not adding anything to this discussion. it doesn't concern you anyway.

The media are not reporting the truth. THAT alone is a major concern.

KAMALA has now plagiarised Trump saying she is going to undo tax on tips.

Unless Americans listen to a Trump rally, the first Demon Rat voters hear of this will be Kamalas announcement. That is a HUGE incentive for hospitality workers to vote Demon Rats.

The media aren't reporting the truth about Vance either so the Demon Rats are in with a chance.


This is horrific if Republicans can't counter Demon Rats 

Too many lies from the left are flying around.

Also Trump is running around saying Kamala is using AI to fake crowd photos on her plane arrivals 5and they are fake.

He is making too many mistakes downing Kackala .... he should minimise insults on her as best he can... he has to be better than her. He should stick to reminding everyone she lied about Biden's brain disease right up until the coup on him the following day.. pointing out if she lied about Bidens brain disease she will be lying about tax cuts to tips.


It would benefit Trumps cause if people here went to leftie shows on youtube and point out the point I just made to lefties. Don't underestimate the swing voters.

And there is no way on this planet the Demon Rats will stop collecting tax off tips. No way. The Demon Rats are about raising taxes and it's estimated they are going to raise them 4 times (that is the rumour I heard). Kackala will never keep that promise.

[Thiel]

It's said copying others is the sincerest form of flattery. But, Trump supporters will believe her as much as they will when she promises to secure theb border.

[caskur]

It's said copying others is the sincerest form of flattery. But, Trump supporters will believe her as much as they will when she promises to secure theb border.

She isn't copying as much as she realises that is a vote from young people who mainly work as waiters and waitresses in hospitality.

Young people aren't  too bright because they haven't lived long enough to have been jaded by empty promises politicians make to get voted in.

I am not worried about the Trump voters, I am worried about the 18-24 demographic.

[JOE]

She isn't copying as much as she realises that is a vote from young people who mainly work as waiters and waitresses in hospitality.

Young people aren't  too bright because they haven't lived long enough to have been jaded by empty promises politicians make to get voted in.

I am not worried about the Trump voters, I am worried about the 18-24 demographic.

I think Kamala might win caskur caskur because personal liberties may be more important to many American voters this time rather than the economy.

ie - women who see Trump/Vance as a threat to their reproductive rights vs Harris/Walz who will promise to improve them.

Another is that project 2025 which a broad base of the electorate may see as a threat to their civil liberties as well.

Mind you, Harris could well end up being a 1 term president, similar to Jimmy Carter (1976-80).

If she gets in it'll be by a squeaker will the other half of the country will feel disenfranchised.

[Herman]

She isn't copying as much as she realises that is a vote from young people who mainly work as waiters and waitresses in hospitality.

Young people aren't  too bright because they haven't lived long enough to have been jaded by empty promises politicians make to get voted in.

I am not worried about the Trump voters, I am worried about the 18-24 demographic.

The idea is popular in battleground state Nevada. Get the picture.

[Herman]

Kevin O'Leary says mega donors are already having regrets about backing Kameltoe.\

"When we syndicate debt for real estate projects, we don't care if you're a Democrat or a Republican. So, I deal with a lot of investors agnostic to politics, and some of them are very big contributors to the Democratic party," O'Leary told Fox News' Jesse Watters.

O'Leary then revealed to Watters that one of those investors told him that "some of us are having buyer's remorse."

"'We wish we'd run a process because we got so much press in the first nine days of bringing somebody into the party and raised the 200 million plus. Which like a balloon under water, it just wasn't Biden,'" he continued, explaining what the investor said.

"So, that's starting to crack a little bit," he added.

It would be important to leave aside the politics and ask, 'What has Kamala Harris actually done, actually achieved?'"

While Harris has been vice president for the past three and a half years, it doesn't seem as if she actually has achieved anything.

"The happy talk is going to have to stop, because someone's going to sit her down and say, 'Let's talk inflation, let's talk border, let's talk policy on energy, let's talk policy on foreign affairs,' and if she doesn't deliver on that," O'Leary explained, "the guy that said, 'I wish we'd run a process,' is going to be right."

[Shen Li]

How does someone become as popular as what the US media says Kamala is without any detailed plans to do anything. Without even being chosen by her party either. That is the state of the US now.

If she is elected, average Americans will be as hard up as average Canadians before the next election in 2028.

[Oliver the Second]

How does someone become as popular as what the US media says Kamala is without any detailed plans to do anything. Without even being chosen by her party either. That is the state of the US now.

If she is elected, average Americans will be as hard up as average Canadians before the next election in 2028.

Kamala has media hype and that's all she has. Nobody likes her and nobody will vote for her. But she'll be railroaded in just as fast as Joe got railroaded out.

[JOE]

If she is elected, average Americans will be as hard up as average Canadians before the next election in 2028.

The experts all say that's coming, no matter who becomes President Shen Li Shen.

So if you hold stocks or planning to buy more, then this is something to think about.

2025 is upposed to be either a slow or poor year for the Stock Market or the economy in general.

The Democrats in the US and politicians in other countries prime pumped the economies for much of 2023-24. So of course, there won't be much gas left in the tank by next year.

Doesn't seem like it's a good time to be bullish on the Stock Market.

[DKG]

The Harris Campaign House of Cards

The honeymoon period for the Harris campaign is coming to an end. If you read the tea leaves and can see through the propaganda of the Regime media apparatus you'll witness a campaign that is built on a house of cards. The left, and sadly many on the right, would love for you to believe that a candidate who was polling at 3% when she ran for President in 2020 is a breakout political star destined to be President, but the moves from her team paint a desperate and frantic picture of a campaign in disarray.

Kamala Harris's campaign has adopted a more assertive stance on border issues out of nowhere, which is an obvious attempt to appeal to a broader base by adopting a tough-on-immigration rhetoric. This strategy is reminiscent of Trump's nearly decade long approach, which is heavily focused on border security and immigration issues.

One of the most discussed moves by the Harris campaign is her endorsement of eliminating taxes on tips for service workers, a policy initially proposed by Trump. During a rally in Las Vegas, Harris announced her support for this idea, which has been seen as a direct borrowing from Trump's playbook. This move has sparked debate about the originality and confidence of her campaign strategy, as it appears to adopt a policy from a political opponent rather than presenting a distinct platform.

Speaking of her platform: she doesn't have one.

If you visit her website you'll find a donate button, a bio of her and Governor Walz, and a shop with merchandise. Mimicking elements of Trump's platform suggests a lack of innovative ideas and could be perceived as a sign of weakness. Winning campaigns typically distinguish themselves with unique messaging and policies rather than borrowing from opponents. Furthermore, the shift towards right-wing populism may transform the race into a contest of who can better embody these ideals. This could potentially alienate some of Harris's traditional progressive base while attempting to capture undecided or swing voters.

These simply aren't the moves of a confident campaign that is sailing to victory, more like a campaign with an identity crisis.

In the 2016 presidential election, Donald Trump faced significant challenges in the polls by the end of August. At that time, Hillary Clinton was leading Trump by notable margins in several key battleground states. For instance, a Washington Post poll indicated that Clinton was ahead by 14 points in Virginia, and a Monmouth University poll showed her with a 9-point lead in Florida, highlighting the uphill battle Trump faced.