Gaybook

[RW]

No, not entirely illegal.

[Anonymous]

It is here. You can't expose yourself in public here.

[RW]

There are exceptions....



Breastfeeding

Nude beaches



And all the various other exceptions state to state.

[Anonymous]

Nude beaches really are not "public".  They are typically tucked away and marked off as nude beaches.  Breast feeding will get you kicked out of establishments and fined if you fail to cover yourself while you do it. Being naked in public isn't legal. And in sexual context....you can't compare Breast feeding to nude men simulating sex acts.

[RW]

I wasn't comparing the two.



Nude beaches are indeed public and any establishment that hassles a woman for breastfeeding deserves to be shut down.



There are many other exceptions including artistic performances in New York, etc.



My point is nothing more than a legal qualifier.

[Anonymous]

Yes, it's entirely illegal. And wrong. And out of everyone agreeing with my side, I'm the only believer.

There are two of us here Dove.

 ac_smile

[Anonymous]

I find public nudity wrong. I find public sex acts wrong. They are both illegal, btw.

So do I Dove..



And after more than 500 posts nobody has been able to answer the question what the nudity and public sex acts have to do with pride in being gay?

[RW]

I did answer.  Without the CONTEXT of the parade entry, it's hard to tell.  



In the case of nudity in the Vancouver parade one year, it was foreskin awareness.  Men promoting not mutilating baby boys by not being ashamed of having foreskin.



There are no public sex acts that I have seen yet.

[Anonymous]

I did answer.  Without the CONTEXT of the parade entry, it's hard to tell.  



In the case of nudity in the Vancouver parade one year, it was foreskin awareness.  Men promoting not mutilating baby boys by not being ashamed of having foreskin.



There are no public sex acts that I have seen yet.

Someone posted a picture of a simulated sex act in broad day light at a gay pride parade..



The only way to make people aware of something like that is to have adults appear nude in front of children?

 

I have seen many breast and prostate awareness campaigns, but none required public nudity.

[Gay Boy Roberto]

Who among us will cast the first stone?



Leviticus 20 21st Century King James Version (KJ21)

9 "'For every one that curseth his father or his mother shall be surely put to death. He hath cursed his father or his mother: his blood shall be upon him.

10 "'And the man that committeth adultery with another man's wife, even he that committeth adultery with his neighbor's wife, the adulterer and the adulteress shall surely be put to death.

11 And the man that lieth with his father's wife hath uncovered his father's nakedness. Both of them shall surely be put to death: their blood shall be upon them.

12 And if a man lie with his daughter-in-law, both of them shall surely be put to death. They have wrought confusion: their blood shall be upon them.

13 "'If a man also lie with mankind as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination. They shall surely be put to death: their blood shall be upon them.

14 "'And if a man take a wife and her mother, it is wickedness. They shall be burned with fire, both he and they, that there be no wickedness among you.

15 "'And if a man lie with a beast, he shall surely be put to death; and ye shall slay the beast.

16 And if a woman approach unto any beast and lie down thereto, thou shalt kill the woman and the beast. They shall surely be put to death: their blood shall be upon them.

17 "'And if a man shall take his sister, his father's daughter or his mother's daughter, and see her nakedness and she see his nakedness, it is a wicked thing; and they shall be cut off in the sight of their people. He hath uncovered his sister's nakedness: he shall bear his iniquity.

18 "'And if a man shall lie with a woman having her sickness and shall uncover her nakedness, he hath discovered her fountain, and she hath uncovered the fountain of her blood; and both of them shall be cut off from among their people.

19 And thou shalt not uncover the nakedness of thy mother's sister nor of thy father's sister, for he uncovereth his near kin: they shall bear their iniquity.

20 And if a man shall lie with his uncle's wife, he hath uncovered his uncle's nakedness. They shall bear their sin: they shall die childless.

21 And if a man shall take his brother's wife, it is an unclean thing. He hath uncovered his brother's nakedness: they shall be childless.

[J0E]

I'm dismayed with the general Christian reaction to the legalizing of gay marriage. It's scripturally, and emotionally unbalanced. It's either a full endorsement or support....or relentless condemnation.

What do you think the Christian reaction should be?



Support or condemnation?

The biblical Christian reaction should be niether. No support of sin....no condemnation.

"No support of sin". So you're saying being gay is a sin.

 God says homosexuality is a sin.  So is fornication. Adultry.  Christ used the word "pornea". Which is all sex outside of God's designed parameters of marriage.

When Christians fornicate, is it a sin? Christians fornicate just as much as anyone else.

Yes, of course there are backsliders in the body of Christ..



But it is still sin though..



Romero, does it bother you that homosexuality is a sin?

....yes, clearly it does.

[Romero]

Yes, of course there are backsliders in the body of Christ..



But it is still sin though..



Romero, does it bother you that homosexuality is a sin?

I don't believe homosexuality is a sin. It is unfortunate that some people think it is. Why would God create homosexuals if it's a sin?

[cc]

Why would God create homosexuals if it's a sin?

Argument Fail:



He also created Hitler,  John Gacy, Manson, Marc Lépine, Al-Baghdadi ....... I "could" go on.



Try a wiser approach



EDIT - And FFS  please don't embarrass yourself further by trying to claim I'm comparing killers to homosexuals

[Romero]

Why would God create homosexuals if it's a sin?

Argument Fail:



He also created Hitler,  John Gacy, Manson, Marc Lépine ....... I "could" go on.



Try another approach



EDIT - And FFS  please don't embarrass yourself further by trying to claim I'm comparing killers to homosexuals

But you are comparing homosexuals to killers. It's right there in your words.



Haven't you said that you've dabbled in a bit of homosexuality here and there?

[cc]

"T H I C K"  defined ^



Sometimes I actually feel sorry for you constantly  embarrassing yourself in public





Well OK ....  on rare occasions  .... and a [size=75]little[/size] bit