News:

R.I.P to the great Charlie Kirk! ~ R.I.P to our friend Caskur!

The best topic

*

Forum gossip thread
Topic rating: 4.43

Other popular topics

Replies: 18068
Total votes: : 7

Last post: January 08, 2026, 06:02:44 PM
Re: Forum gossip thread by Prof Emeritus at Fawk U

B

Hey, alarmists...

Started by Bricktop, July 29, 2015, 03:46:47 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Print
Go Down Pages1 2 3 ... 11
User actions

Bricktop

July 29, 2015, 03:46:47 AM
Over to you...



">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TCy_UOjEir0

Bricktop

#1
July 29, 2015, 03:57:35 AM
">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dIvLEwGS-70

keeper

#2
July 29, 2015, 04:22:35 AM
Quote from: "SPECTRE"Over to you...



">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TCy_UOjEir0

The man is delusinal holy shit balls  :crazy:

RW

#3
July 29, 2015, 04:40:09 AM
You misspelled SCIENTISTS Spec.
Beware of Gaslighters!

Bricktop

#4
July 29, 2015, 04:55:18 AM
Quote from: "Keeper"
Quote from: "SPECTRE"Over to you...



">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TCy_UOjEir0

The man is delusinal holy shit balls  :crazy:

Yeah.



A Nobel LAUREATE.



Howsoever, he has presented facts.



Let us not debate the sanity of the presenter. Let us debate the facts he presents.



Your turn.

RW

#5
July 29, 2015, 05:01:25 AM
Last time I checked they didn't hand out Nobel prizes for Climate or Environmental sciences - only chemistry and physics in the sciences.  Has something changed?
Beware of Gaslighters!

Anonymous

#6
July 29, 2015, 05:56:20 AM
Quote from: "SPECTRE"Over to you...



">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TCy_UOjEir0
 ac_umm

Bricktop

#7
July 29, 2015, 06:20:16 AM
Quote from: "RW"Last time I checked they didn't hand out Nobel prizes for Climate or Environmental sciences - only chemistry and physics in the sciences.  Has something changed?


Ah, right...



So "climatologists" are NOT bound by the laws of physics? Or chemistry? Or logic? Or reason?



Address his facts, not his sanity or scientific capability.

@realAzhyaAryola

#8
July 29, 2015, 06:28:50 AM
Quote from: "RW"Last time I checked they didn't hand out Nobel prizes for Climate or Environmental sciences - only chemistry and physics in the sciences.  Has something changed?


My boss got his in the science and practice of the diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of disease. A few months ago, he decided to go back home to his home state by the Hudson River. A university's medical college in that part has brought him in as a distinguished faculty member. I'm glad he is slowing down. I often wondered why some folks work til their late 70s. He's a fit man, biked to work every day, still does probably. [size=50]I am still paying his phone bills.[/size].
@realAzhyaAryola



[size=80]Sometimes, my comments have a touch of humor, often tongue-in-cheek, so don\'t take it so seriously.[/size]

keeper

#9
July 29, 2015, 06:37:19 AM
Quote from: "SPECTRE"
Quote from: "RW"Last time I checked they didn't hand out Nobel prizes for Climate or Environmental sciences - only chemistry and physics in the sciences.  Has something changed?


Ah, right...



So "climatologists" are NOT bound by the laws of physics? Or chemistry? Or logic? Or reason?



Address his facts, not his sanity or scientific capability.


Not to but in!!!



But there are also facts supporting both sides of the fence. Like he said at the beginning of the video, This is like talking about religion :oeudC: ...

Bricktop

#10
July 29, 2015, 07:44:23 AM
Indeed.



However, the proponents, as he highlights, use language that is insinuating that debate and discussion is redundant. Their case is closed, and only reckless and foolhardy deniers cannot accept their position.



This is wrong, as he makes clear. There is ample room for debate, and the alarmists need to settle down and accept that there are facts which challenge their dogma.



As has been observed many times, however, global warming/climate change has been adapted by socialism as their cause celebre, and socialists have never been much for dissent and contradiction.

Frood

#11
July 29, 2015, 08:12:36 AM
Climate change proponents still can't make their minds up on what's happening, if anything. They've oscillated between ice ages and catastrophic warming over the last 45-50 years. When global warming predictions don't eventuate in their 15 year study durations, it becomes climate change while still being referred to as global warming and the statistics are omitted from official statements, even as evidence mounts that polar ice is actually growing over some of our more recent years and that tree rings and soil striations indicate a relatively smooth cycling through the centuries and millenniums.



It's become the Church of Latter Day Chicken Little's.
Blahhhhhh...

RW

#12
July 29, 2015, 12:47:36 PM
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Surveys_of_scientists%27_views_on_climate_change">https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Surveys ... ate_change">https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Surveys_of_scientists%27_views_on_climate_change



(Sources are provided)
Beware of Gaslighters!

RW

#13
July 29, 2015, 12:50:25 PM
http://climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus/">http://climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus/



For those who don't know what peer reviewed means (Spectre):

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peer_review">https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peer_review
Beware of Gaslighters!

RW

#14
July 29, 2015, 12:57:08 PM Last Edit: July 29, 2015, 01:35:18 PM by RW
Quote from: "Keeper"
Quote from: "SPECTRE"
Quote from: "RW"Last time I checked they didn't hand out Nobel prizes for Climate or Environmental sciences - only chemistry and physics in the sciences.  Has something changed?


Ah, right...



So "climatologists" are NOT bound by the laws of physics? Or chemistry? Or logic? Or reason?



Address his facts, not his sanity or scientific capability.


Not to but in!!!



But there are also facts supporting both sides of the fence. Like he said at the beginning of the video, This is like talking about religion :oeudC: ...

That's just it - it SHOULDN'T be like talking about religion.  It's not about whether you believe in it or not.  It should be that it is what it is.
Beware of Gaslighters!
Print
Go Up Pages1 2 3 ... 11
User actions