Hey, alarmists...

[Bricktop]

Over to you...

[Bricktop]

[keeper]

Over to you...

[RW]

You misspelled SCIENTISTS Spec.

[Bricktop]

Over to you...

[RW]

Last time I checked they didn't hand out Nobel prizes for Climate or Environmental sciences - only chemistry and physics in the sciences.  Has something changed?

[Anonymous]

Over to you...

[Bricktop]

Last time I checked they didn't hand out Nobel prizes for Climate or Environmental sciences - only chemistry and physics in the sciences.  Has something changed?

Ah, right...



So "climatologists" are NOT bound by the laws of physics? Or chemistry? Or logic? Or reason?



Address his facts, not his sanity or scientific capability.

[@realAzhyaAryola]

Last time I checked they didn't hand out Nobel prizes for Climate or Environmental sciences - only chemistry and physics in the sciences.  Has something changed?

My boss got his in the science and practice of the diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of disease. A few months ago, he decided to go back home to his home state by the Hudson River. A university's medical college in that part has brought him in as a distinguished faculty member. I'm glad he is slowing down. I often wondered why some folks work til their late 70s. He's a fit man, biked to work every day, still does probably. [size=50]I am still paying his phone bills.[/size].

[keeper]

Last time I checked they didn't hand out Nobel prizes for Climate or Environmental sciences - only chemistry and physics in the sciences.  Has something changed?

Ah, right...



So "climatologists" are NOT bound by the laws of physics? Or chemistry? Or logic? Or reason?



Address his facts, not his sanity or scientific capability.

Not to but in!!!



But there are also facts supporting both sides of the fence. Like he said at the beginning of the video, This is like talking about religion ...

[Bricktop]

Indeed.



However, the proponents, as he highlights, use language that is insinuating that debate and discussion is redundant. Their case is closed, and only reckless and foolhardy deniers cannot accept their position.



This is wrong, as he makes clear. There is ample room for debate, and the alarmists need to settle down and accept that there are facts which challenge their dogma.



As has been observed many times, however, global warming/climate change has been adapted by socialism as their cause celebre, and socialists have never been much for dissent and contradiction.

[Frood]

Climate change proponents still can't make their minds up on what's happening, if anything. They've oscillated between ice ages and catastrophic warming over the last 45-50 years. When global warming predictions don't eventuate in their 15 year study durations, it becomes climate change while still being referred to as global warming and the statistics are omitted from official statements, even as evidence mounts that polar ice is actually growing over some of our more recent years and that tree rings and soil striations indicate a relatively smooth cycling through the centuries and millenniums.



It's become the Church of Latter Day Chicken Little's.

[RW]

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Surveys_of_scientists%27_views_on_climate_change">https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Surveys ... ate_change">https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Surveys_of_scientists%27_views_on_climate_change



(Sources are provided)

[RW]

http://climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus/">http://climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus/



For those who don't know what peer reviewed means (Spectre):

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peer_review">https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peer_review

[RW]

Last time I checked they didn't hand out Nobel prizes for Climate or Environmental sciences - only chemistry and physics in the sciences.  Has something changed?

Ah, right...



So "climatologists" are NOT bound by the laws of physics? Or chemistry? Or logic? Or reason?



Address his facts, not his sanity or scientific capability.

Not to but in!!!



But there are also facts supporting both sides of the fence. Like he said at the beginning of the video, This is like talking about religion ...

That's just it - it SHOULDN'T be like talking about religion.  It's not about whether you believe in it or not.  It should be that it is what it is.