Women in Iran before the Revolution

[JOE]

While Western Women have gone full bare, seems the women of Iran have gone (or been forced to go the other since the days of pre-revolution)



http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-3359382/Was-really-women-dressed-IRAN-revolution.html">http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/artic ... ution.html">http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-3359382/Was-really-women-dressed-IRAN-revolution.html

Glamorous shots of models in Iranian fashion magazines from the 1970s show just how different life - and fashion - was like before the Revolution.



In a series of pictures taken for magazines and catalogues and posted on photo-sharing site BoredPanda.com, models smile into the camera, twirl their hair and showcase bare legs, arms and hair - all of which must be covered up today.



The images show a Western-orientated aesthetic, and reveal women's freedom up until 1979 when the Islamic Revolution took place.

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2015/12/14/14/2F46F12D00000578-3359382-image-m-45_1450104433933.jpg">



http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2015/12/14/14/2F46F12D00000578-3359382-image-m-56_1450104820133.jpg">



http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2015/12/14/14/2F46F0FA00000578-3359382-image-m-36_1450103788193.jpg">



Iranian women today:



http://a.abcnews.go.com/images/International/gty_140314813_iran_voting_ll_120302_wblog.jpg">

[Romero]

Too bad the UK and US overthrew the Iranian Prime Minister in 1953. Iran would have been a lot different.

[Romero]

Afghanistan before the Soviet invasion:



http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-pr5kCZcSSzc/TieZ4MYEgFI/AAAAAAABHAY/MB1zslixckQ/s400/Afghanistan_in_1950s_1960s_01.jpg">



http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-DucRAW1G66g/TieZ3deHsPI/AAAAAAABHAA/-KXj75PTwXg/s400/Afghanistan_in_1950s_1960s_04.jpg">

[Anonymous]

While Western Women have gone full bare, seems the women of Iran have gone (or been forced to go the other since the days of pre-revolution)



http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-3359382/Was-really-women-dressed-IRAN-revolution.html">http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/artic ... ution.html">http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-3359382/Was-really-women-dressed-IRAN-revolution.html

Glamorous shots of models in Iranian fashion magazines from the 1970s show just how different life - and fashion - was like before the Revolution.



In a series of pictures taken for magazines and catalogues and posted on photo-sharing site BoredPanda.com, models smile into the camera, twirl their hair and showcase bare legs, arms and hair - all of which must be covered up today.



The images show a Western-orientated aesthetic, and reveal women's freedom up until 1979 when the Islamic Revolution took place.

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2015/12/14/14/2F46F12D00000578-3359382-image-m-45_1450104433933.jpg">



http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2015/12/14/14/2F46F12D00000578-3359382-image-m-56_1450104820133.jpg">



http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2015/12/14/14/2F46F0FA00000578-3359382-image-m-36_1450103788193.jpg">



Iranian women today:



http://a.abcnews.go.com/images/International/gty_140314813_iran_voting_ll_120302_wblog.jpg">

I had heard that Iranian women were quite free when the shah was in power..



The shah was similar to Chiang Kai Shek because they were both dictators, women were not second class citizens like they are in today's Islamic Republic of Iran.

[Anonymous]

Too bad the UK and US overthrew the Iranian Prime Minister in 1953. Iran would have been a lot different.

True enough. It would have became an Islamic republic twenty years earlier than when they did.

[cc]

Too bad ... and he tries so hard to blame every islam being islam  on others and claim that islam does not always return to its vile islamic roots especially ...  when left on its own



Turkey, a temporary holdout  thanks only to Ataturk's brilliance and efforts   is back on islam's intended course and fast returning to being just another islamic hellhole .. and fk all to do with any outside forces



Iran (and many other places) are  fundy hellholes because ultimately islam on its own creates ONLY  hellholes



it's islam stupid!!





A thought here - As this is yet another islam extremism thread, Iran regime being extremely so in fact, should it not be with the other extremism threads?

Joe knew that but doesn't like to play by the rules / mistakenly thinks rules don't apply to him



In fact this thread is merely an islamic mate / mimic to the current  http://thebluecashew.net/extremism-f20/travelling-turkey-watch-what-you-wear-ladies-t5502.html">Travelling to Turkey? Watch what you wear, ladies .. . different country, same old islamic fundy ideology = same old misogyny against women .. to name just one of a dozen or more goodies

[GORDY GAMBINO]

same old misogyny against women .....not that theres anything wrong with that.



obey.



lol



555



or git ya tits chopped off

[Anonymous]

Too bad the UK and US overthrew the Iranian Prime Minister in 1953. Iran would have been a lot different.

True enough. It would have became an Islamic republic twenty years earlier than when they did.

It's becoming obvious that was the destiny of the entire region.

[Anonymous]

Too bad the UK and US overthrew the Iranian Prime Minister in 1953. Iran would have been a lot different.

True enough. It would have became an Islamic republic twenty years earlier than when they did.

It's becoming obvious that was the destiny of the entire region.

Of course.

[Anonymous]

Some Iranian men and women are very good looking.

[Anonymous]

Some Iranian men and women are very good looking.

Yes, they are Velvet.

 ac_smile

[Anonymous]

Too bad ... and he tries so hard to blame every islam being islam  on others and claim that islam does not always return to its vile islamic roots especially ...  when left on its own



Turkey, a temporary holdout  thanks only to Ataturk's brilliance and efforts   is back on islam's intended course and fast returning to being just another islamic hellhole .. and fk all to do with any outside forces



Iran (and many other places) are  fundy hellholes because ultimately islam on its own creates ONLY  hellholes



it's islam stupid!!





A thought here - As this is yet another islam extremism thread, Iran regime being extremely so in fact, should it not be with the other extremism threads?

Joe knew that but doesn't like to play by the rules / mistakenly thinks rules don't apply to him



In fact this thread is merely an islamic mate / mimic to the current  http://thebluecashew.net/extremism-f20/travelling-turkey-watch-what-you-wear-ladies-t5502.html">Travelling to Turkey? Watch what you wear, ladies .. . different country, same old islamic fundy ideology = same old misogyny against women .. to name just one of a dozen or more goodies

Joe posts where he wants to post, not in the subs they belong in. Herm, move this please.

[JOE]

Too bad the UK and US overthrew the Iranian Prime Minister in 1953. Iran would have been a lot different.

True enough. It would have became an Islamic republic twenty years earlier than when they did.

Iranians before the revolution and before the Ayatollah came to power were in acuality 'Persians'. The ones who came after the fall of the Shah were 'Iranians'.  I see a real difference. The Persians were sophisticated and cultured. This new breed of Iranians, coarse, rude and uncouthe.



When the Islamacists ordered the women of Iran to cover up, stop using birth control, etc. The country became a brutal theocracy. They smothered and destroyed much of the finer aspeects of  Persian culture.



Old Iran was an ally of the United States. New Iran became an enemy of America. Its kind of like comparing Imperial Japan before World War I. Fascists hijacked that nation's agenda and tranformed it from an ally of the West into an enemy of the US and Britain.



All it takes is a change of government overnight and a nation becomes militaristic, anti western, but ultimately its own citizens are the ones who suffer the most.

[cc]

Persians lost Persia and being Persians in 651  .. becoming controlled and absorbed by comparably crude violent islamics



In 1935 the Iranian government requested those countries which it had diplomatic relations with, to call Persia (a piece of Iran)  "Iran," which is the name of the country in Persian.



1979? .... Close :001_rolleyes: , but no cigar



While it loosened up in "some" areas under the shah, It has been an islamic hellhole since 651 .. and more importantly, occupied by the very same people and their ancestors since then

[Anonymous]

Persians lost Persia and being Persians in 651  .. becoming controlled and absorbed by comparably crude violent islamics



In 1935 the Iranian government requested those countries which it had diplomatic relations with, to call Persia (a piece of Iran)  "Iran," which is the name of the country in Persian.



1979? .... Close :001_rolleyes: , but no cigar



While it loosened up in "some" areas under the shah, It has been an islamic hellhole since 651 .. and more importantly, occupied by the very same people and their ancestors since then

Joe's an asshole Ceec.