What???

[Aryan]

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C1LHlpmXUAAFwut.jpg">



This has to be a joke?  Or are the degenerate perverts in the LBGT community trying to push pedo rights again? They've tried this in the past but it failed, I guess it was only a matter of time until they tested the water again.....











http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2014/02/18/article-2562518-0010B35900000258-656_306x423.jpg">





http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2562518/The-truth-Labour-apologists-paedophilia-Police-probe-child-sex-group-linked-party-officials-wake-Savile.html">http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... avile.html">http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2562518/The-truth-Labour-apologists-paedophilia-Police-probe-child-sex-group-linked-party-officials-wake-Savile.html



https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paedophile_Information_Exchange">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paedophil ... n_Exchange">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paedophile_Information_Exchange

[Aryan]

Where's Blurt?  ac_lmfao

[kiebers]

Ok, Mr. I don't break the rules. Perhaps you should read them daily. But just to ensure that you know what the rules are this is the one you broke with the thread title.



4.   Posts containing pornographic, gory or gross content, images or links is not allowed. We ask if you are going to post material that is questionable for purposes of contextual discussion or for artistic purposes that you please provide a link to the image with a disclaimer rather than posting the image itself. Profiles and [size=120]topic titles shall be free of[/size] personal attacks, [size=120]profanities[/size], slurs, gore, and symbols or slogans of organized hate groups.



please refrain from doing this in the future.

[Aryan]

Ok, Mr. I don't break the rules. Perhaps you should read them daily. But just to ensure that you know what the rules are this is the one you broke with the thread title.



4.   Posts containing pornographic, gory or gross content, images or links is not allowed. We ask if you are going to post material that is questionable for purposes of contextual discussion or for artistic purposes that you please provide a link to the image with a disclaimer rather than posting the image itself. Profiles and [size=120]topic titles shall be free of[/size] personal attacks, [size=120]profanities[/size], slurs, gore, and symbols or slogans of organized hate groups.



please refrain from doing this in the future.

I gathered that writing the word 'fuck' in a thread title is against the rules here after you edited the title, no need for the lengthy explanation and mod muscle flexing again Kiebers.   :001_rolleyes:

[kiebers]

No mod muscle flexing. You broke the rule. I edited. You obviously knew nothing about the rule. I was just showing you the rule so you would not think I was flexing my mod muscle. Now if you knew about the rule then that means you did it intentionally. But I wanted to give you the benefit of the doubt so you would not think I was picking on little ole you.....Now here is the link to our rules. Perhaps you would like to review them.

http://thebluecashew.net/rules-f23/forum-rules-t6116.html">http://thebluecashew.net/rules-f23/foru ... t6116.html">http://thebluecashew.net/rules-f23/forum-rules-t6116.html

[Anonymous]

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C1LHlpmXUAAFwut.jpg">



This has to be a joke?  Or are the degenerate perverts in the LBGT community trying to push pedo rights again? They've tried this in the past but it failed, I guess it was only a matter of time until they tested the water again.....











http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2014/02/18/article-2562518-0010B35900000258-656_306x423.jpg">





http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2562518/The-truth-Labour-apologists-paedophilia-Police-probe-child-sex-group-linked-party-officials-wake-Savile.html">http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... avile.html">http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2562518/The-truth-Labour-apologists-paedophilia-Police-probe-child-sex-group-linked-party-officials-wake-Savile.html



https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paedophile_Information_Exchange">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paedophil ... n_Exchange">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paedophile_Information_Exchange

Pedopsexual??

[Aryan]

I hope it's not true, but like I say, the left have promoted and pushed for pedo rights in the past...

[RW]

I think pedophilia is a sexuality as written above which is why recitivism rates are so high amoung pedophiles.  Like gay or straight, it's hard wired and folllows similar paths in terms of sexual development processes.  In other words, you can't jail them out of being pedophiles.



In terms of "rights", I would like to see them be able to access mental health treatment without being reported unless an act has occurred and a child has been harmed.  I would much rather have these people get help than just be left to their own devices.  



I don't care about their rights per de but I care about the safety of children.  If having unreported access to mental health means fewer kids are abused, I'm all for it.

[RW]

I hope it's not true, but like I say, the left have promoted and pushed for pedo rights in the past...

Proof?

[Aryan]

Links are provided in the original post.



Harriet Harman is a well known Labour MP here in the UK.

[Aryan]

I think pedophilia is a sexuality as written above which is why recitivism rates are so high amoung pedophiles.  Like gay or straight, it's hard wired and folllows similar paths in terms of sexual development processes.  In other words, you can't jail them out of being pedophiles.



In terms of "rights", I would like to see them be able to access mental health treatment without being reported unless an act has occurred and a child has been harmed.  I would much rather have these people get help than just be left to their own devices.  

If they don't act on it I suppose it's not a major problem, however many do act on it. Then of course there's a high probability that they'll view porn, and the more demand there is for that kind of thing, the more kids will be abused.

[RW]

I think pedophilia is a sexuality as written above which is why recitivism rates are so high amoung pedophiles.  Like gay or straight, it's hard wired and folllows similar paths in terms of sexual development processes.  In other words, you can't jail them out of being pedophiles.



In terms of "rights", I would like to see them be able to access mental health treatment without being reported unless an act has occurred and a child has been harmed.  I would much rather have these people get help than just be left to their own devices.  

If they don't act on it I suppose it's not a major problem, however many do act on it. Then of course there's a high probability that they'll view porn, and the more demand there is for that kind of thing, the more kids will be abused.

The idea is to get them to not act.  That means having them access services to help them. They can't right now or they get reported to the police.

[Anonymous]

I think pedophilia is a sexuality as written above which is why recitivism rates are so high amoung pedophiles.  Like gay or straight, it's hard wired and folllows similar paths in terms of sexual development processes.  In other words, you can't jail them out of being pedophiles.



In terms of "rights", I would like to see them be able to access mental health treatment without being reported unless an act has occurred and a child has been harmed.  I would much rather have these people get help than just be left to their own devices.  



I don't care about their rights per de but I care about the safety of children.  If having unreported access to mental health means fewer kids are abused, I'm all for it.

Do you really think many sexual predators would voluntarily report?

[RW]

I think pedophilia is a sexuality as written above which is why recitivism rates are so high amoung pedophiles.  Like gay or straight, it's hard wired and folllows similar paths in terms of sexual development processes.  In other words, you can't jail them out of being pedophiles.



In terms of "rights", I would like to see them be able to access mental health treatment without being reported unless an act has occurred and a child has been harmed.  I would much rather have these people get help than just be left to their own devices.  



I don't care about their rights per de but I care about the safety of children.  If having unreported access to mental health means fewer kids are abused, I'm all for it.

Do you really think many sexual predators would voluntarily report?

Going by what I've seen and read, there is a decent number of them that WANT help but because they'll be reported, they don't seek help.  Personally, I would rather have them talking to professionals than trying to deal with their urges on their own.  Generally those who are professionally treated have already offended.  That's not good enough IMHO.

[realgrimm]

this happened a few years back if I remember they had a FB page .. If this is the same thing, hid themselves in religion, I remember fighting this church where they were incorporating homo/tran/pan...etc thing with sexual liberation  recruiting children from children of church members... Guy who runs this fiasco stands by the right of love and it having no age...no sex..no boundaries.. really sick shit.. has a webpage also.. I'll do some digging, we doxxed all this sick pricks but focused on the leader