South Africa implements apartheid.

[Anonymous]

White South African farmers have turned to a former Israeli special forces agent to train them in self-defense, according to local press.



After the South African parliament adopted a motion in February to potentially take land from white South African farmers and redistribute it to predominantly black workers without compensation, farmers have feared an increase in violence targeting their community. Idan Abolnik, a former soldier with the Israeli special forces, has offered his services to train farmers to protect themselves.



"It's open to everyone and anyone who wants a specially designed system for farmers," said Abolnik, who trains clients in the Israeli-developed Krav Maga fighting system, according to the website The South African citing TV channel News24. "We train them to deal with a variety of different attacks. We teach them hand-to-hand combat, bush warfare,semi-bush warfare, urban warfare and how to collect information."



The course involves training with weapons and hand-to-hand combat. Participants learn to deal with home invasions, violent assaults and even the threat of an execution. Abolnik teaches his students how to overpower and defeat attackers, which many now believe is a necessary skill.

I would think the best answer is to leave. But if they can't or don't want to, arming one's self, training, forming militia type organizations is the second best answer. (I would suggest for those who can afford it-- razor wire fences, guard dogs, and a burglar alarm too)[/quote]
That's really the only answer.

[Wazzzup]

The "Hitler Of South Africa" Tells White People, He Won't Kill Them...Yet!

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-06-15/hitler-south-africa-tells-white-people-he-wont-kill-themyet">https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-06- ... ll-themyet">https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-06-15/hitler-south-africa-tells-white-people-he-wont-kill-themyet



https://www.zerohedge.com/sites/default/files/styles/inline_image_desktop/public/inline-images/malema.png?itok=Nshc-N-J">

Earlier this week while most of the world was transfixed on the World Cup, the Trump/Kim handshake, or a multitude of other sundry events, Julius Malema, aka the Hitler of South Africa, was busy telling white people in his country that he's not going wage genocide against them. Yet.



In an interview with TRT World News published this week, Malema said, "We have not called for the killing of white people. At least for now. I can't guarantee the future."



When the reporter mentioned that some people might view these remarks as a call to genocide, Malema responded, "Crybabies. Crybabies," but later warned white South Africans that "the masses are on board" for "an un-led revolution and anarchy".



Malema is a prominent politician in South Africa and at the forefront of his country's movement to confiscate land from white property owners and redistribute it to the country's black population.



No actual specifics about the plan have been revealed, of course.



So even if someone thinks this land grab is social justice, it's at least reasonable to acknowledge the massive corruption that plagues South Africa's government.



And presuming that a multi-billion dollar expropriation wouldn't be fraught with graft is just plain naive.



There has also been zero acknowledgement that forced exprorpriation of private property would cause a wave of defaults on real estate mortgages, triggering a massive banking crisis and unforgiving recession.



South Africa already has a prime example about the economic consequences: Zimbabwe's own land expropriation plunged that country into an economic cataclysm spanning two decades.



Yet these all seem to be irrelevant details.



Malema even went so far as to downplay Zimbabwe's economic catastrophe, saying "You cannot [measure] the Zimbawean revolution based on the capitalist definition."



I'm not sure what Marxist definition he's using to measure success.



But we do know that two decades after land redistribution in Zimbabwe (which used to be considered the breadbasket of southern Africa), more than a quarter of the population is in danger of starving to death.



So even by the most basic metrics, Zimbabwe's policies have been a total failure. Copying them is tantamount to suicide.



It's truly astonishing that someone so dangerous and out of touch has been able to rise to power. And even more astonishing how quickly it's happened.



A decade ago few people had heard of Malema. Now he commands millions and grows more powerful each day.



Swift, radical changes like this are common around the world, and throughout history.



In 1913, just a few years before the Russian Revolution, the Bolsheviks were a tiny group of radicals. Four years later they had taken over the entire country.



In 1928, the Nazi party was an obscure joke, winning a mere 2.6% of the votes in the national election that year.



Not even five years later, Adolf Hitler was German chancellor and had been awarded supreme power by the Enabling Act of 1933.



Point is, the world can change very quickly.

[Angry White Male]

Of course this will happen anywhere Whites become the minority.



Europe is heading in the same direction, with Islam due to becoming the lead force there.  It doesn't take much imagination to predict what the outcome of that will be.



When White people 'lose their way' and allow another entity to take over, the outcome is not favourable to the host nation.



Ironically, straight white males will be the ones best able to fit in with the ideals of Islam.  Women, Gays, Leftards, etc...  the groups that actually push hardest for the flood of Islam into Europe, are actually the very ones that Islam despises the most.  It is quite curious that they fail to see this, but they will feel it the hardest in time!

[Anonymous]

The "Hitler Of South Africa" Tells White People, He Won't Kill Them...Yet!

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-06-15/hitler-south-africa-tells-white-people-he-wont-kill-themyet">https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-06- ... ll-themyet">https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-06-15/hitler-south-africa-tells-white-people-he-wont-kill-themyet



https://www.zerohedge.com/sites/default/files/styles/inline_image_desktop/public/inline-images/malema.png?itok=Nshc-N-J">

Earlier this week while most of the world was transfixed on the World Cup, the Trump/Kim handshake, or a multitude of other sundry events, Julius Malema, aka the Hitler of South Africa, was busy telling white people in his country that he's not going wage genocide against them. Yet.



In an interview with TRT World News published this week, Malema said, "We have not called for the killing of white people. At least for now. I can't guarantee the future."



When the reporter mentioned that some people might view these remarks as a call to genocide, Malema responded, "Crybabies. Crybabies," but later warned white South Africans that "the masses are on board" for "an un-led revolution and anarchy".



Malema is a prominent politician in South Africa and at the forefront of his country's movement to confiscate land from white property owners and redistribute it to the country's black population.



No actual specifics about the plan have been revealed, of course.



So even if someone thinks this land grab is social justice, it's at least reasonable to acknowledge the massive corruption that plagues South Africa's government.



And presuming that a multi-billion dollar expropriation wouldn't be fraught with graft is just plain naive.



There has also been zero acknowledgement that forced exprorpriation of private property would cause a wave of defaults on real estate mortgages, triggering a massive banking crisis and unforgiving recession.



South Africa already has a prime example about the economic consequences: Zimbabwe's own land expropriation plunged that country into an economic cataclysm spanning two decades.



Yet these all seem to be irrelevant details.



Malema even went so far as to downplay Zimbabwe's economic catastrophe, saying "You cannot [measure] the Zimbawean revolution based on the capitalist definition."



I'm not sure what Marxist definition he's using to measure success.



But we do know that two decades after land redistribution in Zimbabwe (which used to be considered the breadbasket of southern Africa), more than a quarter of the population is in danger of starving to death.



So even by the most basic metrics, Zimbabwe's policies have been a total failure. Copying them is tantamount to suicide.



It's truly astonishing that someone so dangerous and out of touch has been able to rise to power. And even more astonishing how quickly it's happened.



A decade ago few people had heard of Malema. Now he commands millions and grows more powerful each day.



Swift, radical changes like this are common around the world, and throughout history.



In 1913, just a few years before the Russian Revolution, the Bolsheviks were a tiny group of radicals. Four years later they had taken over the entire country.



In 1928, the Nazi party was an obscure joke, winning a mere 2.6% of the votes in the national election that year.



Not even five years later, Adolf Hitler was German chancellor and had been awarded supreme power by the Enabling Act of 1933.



Point is, the world can change very quickly.

He only wants to persecute whites, so no problem.

[Wazzzup]

The "Hitler Of South Africa" Tells White People, He Won't Kill Them...Yet!

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-06-15/hitler-south-africa-tells-white-people-he-wont-kill-themyet">https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-06- ... ll-themyet">https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-06-15/hitler-south-africa-tells-white-people-he-wont-kill-themyet



https://www.zerohedge.com/sites/default/files/styles/inline_image_desktop/public/inline-images/malema.png?itok=Nshc-N-J">

Earlier this week while most of the world was transfixed on the World Cup, the Trump/Kim handshake, or a multitude of other sundry events, Julius Malema, aka the Hitler of South Africa, was busy telling white people in his country that he's not going wage genocide against them. Yet.



In an interview with TRT World News published this week, Malema said, "We have not called for the killing of white people. At least for now. I can't guarantee the future."



When the reporter mentioned that some people might view these remarks as a call to genocide, Malema responded, "Crybabies. Crybabies," but later warned white South Africans that "the masses are on board" for "an un-led revolution and anarchy".



Malema is a prominent politician in South Africa and at the forefront of his country's movement to confiscate land from white property owners and redistribute it to the country's black population.



No actual specifics about the plan have been revealed, of course.



So even if someone thinks this land grab is social justice, it's at least reasonable to acknowledge the massive corruption that plagues South Africa's government.



And presuming that a multi-billion dollar expropriation wouldn't be fraught with graft is just plain naive.



There has also been zero acknowledgement that forced exprorpriation of private property would cause a wave of defaults on real estate mortgages, triggering a massive banking crisis and unforgiving recession.



South Africa already has a prime example about the economic consequences: Zimbabwe's own land expropriation plunged that country into an economic cataclysm spanning two decades.



Yet these all seem to be irrelevant details.



Malema even went so far as to downplay Zimbabwe's economic catastrophe, saying "You cannot [measure] the Zimbawean revolution based on the capitalist definition."



I'm not sure what Marxist definition he's using to measure success.



But we do know that two decades after land redistribution in Zimbabwe (which used to be considered the breadbasket of southern Africa), more than a quarter of the population is in danger of starving to death.



So even by the most basic metrics, Zimbabwe's policies have been a total failure. Copying them is tantamount to suicide.



It's truly astonishing that someone so dangerous and out of touch has been able to rise to power. And even more astonishing how quickly it's happened.



A decade ago few people had heard of Malema. Now he commands millions and grows more powerful each day.



Swift, radical changes like this are common around the world, and throughout history.



In 1913, just a few years before the Russian Revolution, the Bolsheviks were a tiny group of radicals. Four years later they had taken over the entire country.



In 1928, the Nazi party was an obscure joke, winning a mere 2.6% of the votes in the national election that year.



Not even five years later, Adolf Hitler was German chancellor and had been awarded supreme power by the Enabling Act of 1933.



Point is, the world can change very quickly.

He only wants to persecute whites, so no problem.

Exactly right and even though proof is not needed here is more proof.





http://www.africanews.com/2018/06/21/south-africa-julius-malema-under-fire-for-alleged-racist-comments/">http://www.africanews.com/2018/06/21/so ... -comments/">http://www.africanews.com/2018/06/21/south-africa-julius-malema-under-fire-for-alleged-racist-comments/

The South Africa Human Rights Commission (SAHRC) say they are set to investigate leader of the Economic Freedom Fighters EFF Julius Malema over what has been termed by some to be openly racists comments against Indian South Africans.



The former ANC youth league leader is under fire after remarks he made at the weekend claiming Indians were racists towards black South Africans, and their communities in South Africa treated blacks as subhumans, even underpaying them for work done.

That's where Malema messed up, he can talk about "cutting the throat of whiteness" taking land away from whites with no compensation and alluding to wanting kill off whites in SA all he wants.  BUT he said something negative about indians so NOW he is in trouble.



Oh, what a wacky world.

[Anonymous]

The "Hitler Of South Africa" Tells White People, He Won't Kill Them...Yet!

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-06-15/hitler-south-africa-tells-white-people-he-wont-kill-themyet">https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-06- ... ll-themyet">https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-06-15/hitler-south-africa-tells-white-people-he-wont-kill-themyet



https://www.zerohedge.com/sites/default/files/styles/inline_image_desktop/public/inline-images/malema.png?itok=Nshc-N-J">

Earlier this week while most of the world was transfixed on the World Cup, the Trump/Kim handshake, or a multitude of other sundry events, Julius Malema, aka the Hitler of South Africa, was busy telling white people in his country that he's not going wage genocide against them. Yet.



In an interview with TRT World News published this week, Malema said, "We have not called for the killing of white people. At least for now. I can't guarantee the future."



When the reporter mentioned that some people might view these remarks as a call to genocide, Malema responded, "Crybabies. Crybabies," but later warned white South Africans that "the masses are on board" for "an un-led revolution and anarchy".



Malema is a prominent politician in South Africa and at the forefront of his country's movement to confiscate land from white property owners and redistribute it to the country's black population.



No actual specifics about the plan have been revealed, of course.



So even if someone thinks this land grab is social justice, it's at least reasonable to acknowledge the massive corruption that plagues South Africa's government.



And presuming that a multi-billion dollar expropriation wouldn't be fraught with graft is just plain naive.



There has also been zero acknowledgement that forced exprorpriation of private property would cause a wave of defaults on real estate mortgages, triggering a massive banking crisis and unforgiving recession.



South Africa already has a prime example about the economic consequences: Zimbabwe's own land expropriation plunged that country into an economic cataclysm spanning two decades.



Yet these all seem to be irrelevant details.



Malema even went so far as to downplay Zimbabwe's economic catastrophe, saying "You cannot [measure] the Zimbawean revolution based on the capitalist definition."



I'm not sure what Marxist definition he's using to measure success.



But we do know that two decades after land redistribution in Zimbabwe (which used to be considered the breadbasket of southern Africa), more than a quarter of the population is in danger of starving to death.



So even by the most basic metrics, Zimbabwe's policies have been a total failure. Copying them is tantamount to suicide.



It's truly astonishing that someone so dangerous and out of touch has been able to rise to power. And even more astonishing how quickly it's happened.



A decade ago few people had heard of Malema. Now he commands millions and grows more powerful each day.



Swift, radical changes like this are common around the world, and throughout history.



In 1913, just a few years before the Russian Revolution, the Bolsheviks were a tiny group of radicals. Four years later they had taken over the entire country.



In 1928, the Nazi party was an obscure joke, winning a mere 2.6% of the votes in the national election that year.



Not even five years later, Adolf Hitler was German chancellor and had been awarded supreme power by the Enabling Act of 1933.



Point is, the world can change very quickly.

He only wants to persecute whites, so no problem.

Exactly right and even though proof is not needed here is more proof.





http://www.africanews.com/2018/06/21/south-africa-julius-malema-under-fire-for-alleged-racist-comments/">http://www.africanews.com/2018/06/21/so ... -comments/">http://www.africanews.com/2018/06/21/south-africa-julius-malema-under-fire-for-alleged-racist-comments/

The South Africa Human Rights Commission (SAHRC) say they are set to investigate leader of the Economic Freedom Fighters EFF Julius Malema over what has been termed by some to be openly racists comments against Indian South Africans.



The former ANC youth league leader is under fire after remarks he made at the weekend claiming Indians were racists towards black South Africans, and their communities in South Africa treated blacks as subhumans, even underpaying them for work done.

That's where Malema messed up, he can talk about "cutting the throat of whiteness" taking land away from whites with no compensation and alluding to wanting kill off whites in SA all he wants.  BUT he said something negative about indians so NOW he is in trouble.



Oh, what a wacky world.

Wacky indeed.

[Anonymous]

The "Hitler Of South Africa" Tells White People, He Won't Kill Them...Yet!

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-06-15/hitler-south-africa-tells-white-people-he-wont-kill-themyet">https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-06- ... ll-themyet">https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-06-15/hitler-south-africa-tells-white-people-he-wont-kill-themyet



https://www.zerohedge.com/sites/default/files/styles/inline_image_desktop/public/inline-images/malema.png?itok=Nshc-N-J">

Earlier this week while most of the world was transfixed on the World Cup, the Trump/Kim handshake, or a multitude of other sundry events, Julius Malema, aka the Hitler of South Africa, was busy telling white people in his country that he's not going wage genocide against them. Yet.



In an interview with TRT World News published this week, Malema said, "We have not called for the killing of white people. At least for now. I can't guarantee the future."



When the reporter mentioned that some people might view these remarks as a call to genocide, Malema responded, "Crybabies. Crybabies," but later warned white South Africans that "the masses are on board" for "an un-led revolution and anarchy".



Malema is a prominent politician in South Africa and at the forefront of his country's movement to confiscate land from white property owners and redistribute it to the country's black population.



No actual specifics about the plan have been revealed, of course.



So even if someone thinks this land grab is social justice, it's at least reasonable to acknowledge the massive corruption that plagues South Africa's government.



And presuming that a multi-billion dollar expropriation wouldn't be fraught with graft is just plain naive.



There has also been zero acknowledgement that forced exprorpriation of private property would cause a wave of defaults on real estate mortgages, triggering a massive banking crisis and unforgiving recession.



South Africa already has a prime example about the economic consequences: Zimbabwe's own land expropriation plunged that country into an economic cataclysm spanning two decades.



Yet these all seem to be irrelevant details.



Malema even went so far as to downplay Zimbabwe's economic catastrophe, saying "You cannot [measure] the Zimbawean revolution based on the capitalist definition."



I'm not sure what Marxist definition he's using to measure success.



But we do know that two decades after land redistribution in Zimbabwe (which used to be considered the breadbasket of southern Africa), more than a quarter of the population is in danger of starving to death.



So even by the most basic metrics, Zimbabwe's policies have been a total failure. Copying them is tantamount to suicide.



It's truly astonishing that someone so dangerous and out of touch has been able to rise to power. And even more astonishing how quickly it's happened.



A decade ago few people had heard of Malema. Now he commands millions and grows more powerful each day.



Swift, radical changes like this are common around the world, and throughout history.



In 1913, just a few years before the Russian Revolution, the Bolsheviks were a tiny group of radicals. Four years later they had taken over the entire country.



In 1928, the Nazi party was an obscure joke, winning a mere 2.6% of the votes in the national election that year.



Not even five years later, Adolf Hitler was German chancellor and had been awarded supreme power by the Enabling Act of 1933.



Point is, the world can change very quickly.

He only wants to persecute whites, so no problem.

Exactly right and even though proof is not needed here is more proof.





http://www.africanews.com/2018/06/21/south-africa-julius-malema-under-fire-for-alleged-racist-comments/">http://www.africanews.com/2018/06/21/so ... -comments/">http://www.africanews.com/2018/06/21/south-africa-julius-malema-under-fire-for-alleged-racist-comments/

The South Africa Human Rights Commission (SAHRC) say they are set to investigate leader of the Economic Freedom Fighters EFF Julius Malema over what has been termed by some to be openly racists comments against Indian South Africans.



The former ANC youth league leader is under fire after remarks he made at the weekend claiming Indians were racists towards black South Africans, and their communities in South Africa treated blacks as subhumans, even underpaying them for work done.

That's where Malema messed up, he can talk about "cutting the throat of whiteness" taking land away from whites with no compensation and alluding to wanting kill off whites in SA all he wants.  BUT he said something negative about indians so NOW he is in trouble.



Oh, what a wacky world.

Persecuting any people because of their race is wrong Julius Malema.

[Wazzzup]

[size=150]Julius Malema calls critical black reporters "house n****rs"[/size]

https://www.thesouthafrican.com/julius-malema-comments-black-journalists/">https://www.thesouthafrican.com/julius- ... urnalists/">https://www.thesouthafrican.com/julius-malema-comments-black-journalists/



Not a particularly important story, but the reason I put it up is I find it interesting that so often malema invokes American Political Correctness terminology.  Just like when eh said "cut the throat of WHITENESS" Whiteness is a term college professors often use to say (pretend) they aren't against white people but rather racial hierarchies.

[Anonymous]

What would happen to the white shaming movement in the USA if it was proven without any doubt that privilege is not based on skin colour?



Would they just say sorry and throw in the towel?

[Wazzzup]

What would happen to the white shaming movement in the USA if it was proven without any doubt that privilege is not based on skin colour?



Would they just say sorry and throw in the towel?

They will never throw in the towel, these people are zealots impervious to reason.   the only answer is to persuade rational people of what is going on, and then work within the law to defeat the people doing this whenever possible.  Like making them take down white privilege posters, taking them to court over affirmative action admissions policies etc. and of course not giving in to intimidation which is their primary weapon.

[Anonymous]

What would happen to the white shaming movement in the USA if it was proven without any doubt that privilege is not based on skin colour?



Would they just say sorry and throw in the towel?

Did the climate alarmists give up when they were caught with their thumb on the scale? They doubled down on extremism and so will the white hate movement.

[Wazzzup]

Malema tweets Farakkhan video calling for racial violence, says "Amen"



https://twitter.com/Julius_S_Malema/status/1016032858199199746/video/1">https://twitter.com/Julius_S_Malema/sta ... 46/video/1">https://twitter.com/Julius_S_Malema/status/1016032858199199746/video/1