I am not going to pretend outrage like progtards do. I know prog wealth and power sees blue collar workers like me as garbage. We are in the way of their aim of total power.

The msm claims Biden's remark was 'a gaffe' and a clear 'misstatement.'

Quote from: Shen Li on October 31, 2024, 12:26:23 AMLibtards hate half of all Americans. It's the same back in Canada. Trudeau and Singh hate a large number of Canadians.

Libtards hating on people is as North American as a witchhunt for racists.

Well, I hate all libtards, so thats fair.

Stacey Abrams still maintains that voter suppression tactics are being implemented in Georgia despite voter turnout reaching record levels.

Quote from: Lokmar on October 31, 2024, 02:20:30 PMWell, I hate all libtards, so thats fair.

However, you don't have the entire media at your disposal like they do.

This is the latest episode of political violence against a Trump supporter.

A60-year-old man has been arrested for allegedly assaulting a Trump supporter in a New York grocery store for wearing a "Trump 2024" hat.

According to a statement released by the Village of Bath Police Department, officers were dispatched to the Tops Friendly Markets grocery store around 10 a.m. on Friday. Police were responding to an alleged fight at the grocery store.

The altercation allegedly was an incident of political violence.

The Village of Bath Police Department said 60-year-old Robert Yott "initiated a confrontation" after he became "aggressive over the fact that a stranger was wearing a Trump 2024 hat."

Police said the suspect punched the Trump supporter in the mouth and head several times, which caused the victim's "teeth to be broken and mouth bloody."

Investigators noted that the two men didn't know each other, and the alleged attack was a "random act of violence."

Heavily Democratic cities are now in the habit of boarding up windows and shuttering businesses ahead of political events that might upset local leftists.

That is certainly the case with Washington, D.C., which erected "Black Lives Matter"-branded plywood boards and fencing outside of stores ahead of the 2020 election and saw businesses brace for chaos again when Roe v. Wade was overturned. Some businesses in the city also took precautions ahead of the January 2017 anti-Trump riots, where all the rioters ultimately got off scot-free, as well as ahead of the Jan. 6, 2021, protests, where rioters were held to a different standard.

Possibly anticipating more chaos in the District of Columbia, where 92.1% of the vote in the last presidential election went to Joe Biden, businesses are once again reinforcing their windows and preparing for potentially "fiery but mostly peaceful protests."

Burning Bernie

We begin in 2015, when Trump officially announced that he would run for president. Regime members initially treated this decision as a godsend. They did everything they could to help Trump overtake "viable" candidates who might have a chance to defeat Hillary Clinton.

Thus, between snickers about Trump's prospects, legacy media outlets were happy to provide as much free coverage as possible for Trump, to the tune of $5 billion.

Helping Trump win the nomination would serve two important purposes for the Regime: One, it would propel Regime dream candidate Hillary Clinton to the White House. Two, it would weaken the GOP. A weaker GOP would decrease the chances that a "serious" non-Regime outsider, perhaps with Tea Party roots, could rise in the future to challenge the Regime.

But there was still the small matter of Bernie Sanders.

Sanders polled very well and won some crucial early primaries, including New Hampshire. He also lost the Iowa Caucus by the smallest-ever margin, greatly exceeding pre-primary expectations. Ultimately, Hillary Clinton could not secure the nomination without the help of unpledged delegates or "superdelegates."

Unlike delegates secured through primaries, which provided an insufficient margin to give Clinton the nomination, she carried superdelegates 571 to Sanders' 45.

Subsequent revelations would also show that the Clinton campaign made a secret deal with the DNC to assume financial control of the organization — not after securing the nomination, as is the usual practice, but some 15 months before. It did so by assuming the debt of the 2012 Obama campaign, a step that allowed the Clinton campaign to control the finances of the party during the entirety of the 2016 primary season.

Progs are nuts.

Quote from: Brent on November 05, 2024, 02:30:07 PMProgs are nuts.

I'd love to sit back and watch her get raped to death by MS-13 and tossed into Locustberg's rape dumpster!

Quote from: Brent on November 05, 2024, 02:09:28 PMBurning Bernie

We begin in 2015, when Trump officially announced that he would run for president. Regime members initially treated this decision as a godsend. They did everything they could to help Trump overtake "viable" candidates who might have a chance to defeat Hillary Clinton.

Thus, between snickers about Trump's prospects, legacy media outlets were happy to provide as much free coverage as possible for Trump, to the tune of $5 billion.

Helping Trump win the nomination would serve two important purposes for the Regime: One, it would propel Regime dream candidate Hillary Clinton to the White House. Two, it would weaken the GOP. A weaker GOP would decrease the chances that a "serious" non-Regime outsider, perhaps with Tea Party roots, could rise in the future to challenge the Regime.

But there was still the small matter of Bernie Sanders.

Sanders polled very well and won some crucial early primaries, including New Hampshire. He also lost the Iowa Caucus by the smallest-ever margin, greatly exceeding pre-primary expectations. Ultimately, Hillary Clinton could not secure the nomination without the help of unpledged delegates or "superdelegates."

Unlike delegates secured through primaries, which provided an insufficient margin to give Clinton the nomination, she carried superdelegates 571 to Sanders' 45.

Subsequent revelations would also show that the Clinton campaign made a secret deal with the DNC to assume financial control of the organization — not after securing the nomination, as is the usual practice, but some 15 months before. It did so by assuming the debt of the 2012 Obama campaign, a step that allowed the Clinton campaign to control the finances of the party during the entirety of the 2016 primary season.

It was sickening for a country that promotes transparent democracy around the world.