You’re damn right I will vote for a convicted felon

[Frood]

Well they nailed Clinton over the same sorta thing although he was never convicted.

Someone here remarked that Trump is a 1980s/90s Democratic President or candidate. In some respects that is true. Ie John Edward's Eliott Pitz & others. But they managed to get away with it but he didn't

Ok, Canuckistani Boomer.

[JOE]

I'm fully aware of the obvious fact that he is a drooling fucktard. But I figured I'd have a little fun with some creative analogies in the process.

I mostly leave him to shit in his own playpen to his heart's content because it's not like he's going to suddenly come up with some valuable knowledge or anything

Actually Bigly for some reason, I find this verdict somewhat disturbing. Not sure why. As Tulsi Gabbard said, it's not something people should gloat about because moving forward it divides your country not heals it. The verdict has not resolved anything or outstanding differences. Its akin to the dred Scott decision or Roe v Wade. It creates more fissures than resolves.

[Biggie Smiles]

what's next now that we're constructing these types of frankenstien precedents where you can be jailed for logging payments ambiguously despite the fact that all the detail in the world wouldn't have the slightest bit of consequence on anyone?

Will we be placing NY based business owners in jail for recording time of day start times in EST instead of UTC? If someone logs overtime in the form of 3.6 hours and accounting decides ah fuckit just round up to 4 hours will they suffer for such a heinous crime 10 years after the fact?


The scum on the left is so blinded by their rage they cannot see the forest for the trees and do not understand how precedent is just a powerful standard as is legislating something law. See Roe vs Wade for details.

you leftist scumbags disgust me

[JOE]

what's next now that we're constructing these types of frankenstien precedents where you can be jailed for logging payments ambiguously despite the fact that all the detail in the world wouldn't have the slightest bit of consequence on anyone?

Will we be placing NY based business owners in jail for recording time of day start times in EST instead of UTC? If someone logs overtime in the form of 3.6 hours and accounting decides ah fuckit just round up to 4 hours will they suffer for such a heinous crime 10 years after the fact?


The scum on the left is so blinded by their rage they cannot see the forest for the trees and do not understand how precedent is just a powerful standard as is legislating something law. See Roe vs Wade for details.

you leftist scumbags disgust me

Actually Bigly if they were going after an ex President they shoulda gone after Bush Cheney. Those bastards ruined yer country and much of the world.

....oh but wait, they're protected by the Deep State and the political Establishment. Lol

[JOE]

One ex President starts illegal wars that result in a million deaths gets off while the other fucks a Porn star & gets nailed with a Criminal record.

Yeah that seems logical

[Biggie Smiles]

Actually Bigly if they were going after an ex President they shoulda gone after Bush Cheney. Those bastards ruined yer country and much of the world.

....oh but wait, they're protected by the Deep State and the political Establishment. Lol

True

and maybe they could have gone after the clintons for the very same activities?

worse actually.. as the Steele dossier and the concealment of payments used to fund it most certainly had an impact on the 2016 election and even the 4 years after as I seem to recall the Russia Russia Russia probe that cost American 36 million in tax payer funding had it's roots in that whole transcript of lies

but you're a fucking moron who sits on the fence acting like there's some grand and baffling mystery to it all when in fact it's as plain as fucking daylight to anyone who can divide their IQ by 2 and still arrive at a whole number

[JOE]

but you're a fucking moron who sits on the fence acting like there's some grand and baffling mystery to it all when in fact it's as plain as fucking daylight to anyone who can divide their IQ by 2 and still arrive at a whole number

I just don't know enough about all the facts of the case or why Trump got nailed in 34/34 counts. That does seem rather severe.

Trump may have stepped over the line. However the degree with which he did is questionable & whether this is actually a Civil matter as opposed to a Criminal case

[Biggie Smiles]

I just don't know enough about all the facts of the case or why Trump got nailed in 34/34 counts. That does seem rather severe.

There was a single 130,000 payment to Stormy Daniels was there not? So ask yourself where do these 34 counts come from?

Or let me put it to you this way. If I decide to be a selfless servant of mankind and take a knife and stab you in the face 34 times, striking the same wound each time, and the world is unfortunate enough that day that you manage to escape death, how many counts of attempted homicide should I be charged with?

One? Or 34?

An intelligent person would say one as it is clear I tried to kill you but you are just one lucky son of a bitch or I am just an incompetent bastard who should have stabbed myself in the face instead

what say you?

[JOE]

There was a single 130,000 payment to Stormy Daniels was there not? So ask yourself where do these 34 counts come from?

Or let me put it to you this way. If I decide to be a selfless servant of mankind and take a knife and stab you in the face 34 times, striking the same wound each time, and the world is unfortunate enough that day that you manage to escape death, how many counts of attempted homicide should I be charged with?

One? Or 34?

An intelligent person would say one as it is clear I tried to kill you but you are just one lucky son of a bitch or I am just an incompetent bastard who should have stabbed myself in the face instead

what say you?

I think they did that to Trump because they very much fear that he could be elected in November. So even if he is  this will slow him down and put him on a leash. This is what the political Establishment in your country wants. Evidently it's not only Democrats either. Globalist Republicans such as Liz Cheney and Mitt Romney probably wanted this verdict too.

Trump seems to have as many enemies within his own party than outside of it.

[Biggie Smiles]

I think they did that to Trump because they very much fear that he could be elected in November.

and in today's episode of water is wet and sunlight is bright ........................

[JOE]

and in today's episode of water is wet and sunlight is bright ........................

also your analogy of Trump being stabbed 34 times is interesting because in some respects it's not unlike what was done to Julius Caesar.



He was becoming too powerful, his enemies feared him so they stabbed him to death.

[Biggie Smiles]

Hey Guise... let's do something really marvel and mav eh.

You know, fly by the seat of your pants with your hair on fire for a change? So Buckle yourselves in because you are about to go on an awesome ride! Something most idiot lemming drones on the left will never have you do.

We are going to read the actual statute at the heart of Trump's alleged 34 count crime.

nycourts.gov/judges/cji/2-PenalLaw/175/175.10.pdf


Would you look at that? A whole 4 pages one must endure reading to get to the heart of the matter. Gosh, metoo# I know what you're thinking. 4 pages? All those wierd werdz and no pretty pictures? Cant we just  let the lovely ladies on the view interpret this all for us?

Fear not! I am here to help. So I will extract the relevant tidbits for your mental consumption and make sure they are in small bite sized chunks so as not to overwhelm your sensibilities.

you're welcome.

First up.. on page one it reads "with intent to defraud that includes an intent to commit another crime or to aid or conceal the commission thereof"

whoa noah! What's with all them werdz thinggies babbling on about other crimes and intent which must lay the foundation here. 

As we mull over the context of this law and how it extends to the actions of the accused do you expect us to burden ourselves with pesky little inconvenient questions like "who it is that is being defrauded or how we are to know the "mens rae" of the accused?

For those of you idiots on the left, "mens rae" is a legal term used to denote "intent" -- the mind state of the accused. What they were thinking during the commission of the crime.

Moving right along to page two

on page two we learn that Donald J Trump is indeed Omnipotent. That's right. He knows all things about all things about all things. Just like Santa Clause you see. He knows business records are being recorded incorrectly, he knows when they are not, He knows what Michael Cohen is thinking even when he's not.

amazaballs. yes, I can totally see where he was fully aware of how all business transactions were being recorded in a business that had no duty whatsoever to report earnings, expenses or anything else to any body other than the IRS.

Page 3 -- we're gonna use a big word now friends and do something you might find a bit discomforting. We are going to attempt to stitch two concepts together to see what is the crux here.

Intent and the act of defrauding.

so here's where we really go down the rabbit hole. What was the intent? what was the crime he was attempting to conceal and whom was it that was defrauded and what consequence did they endure as a result of said defrauding?

anyone care to indulge?

[Thiel]

One ex President starts illegal wars that result in a million deaths gets off while the other fucks a Porn star & gets nailed with a Criminal record.

Yeah that seems logical

Honeybunch, what did daddy Thiel tell you about deliberately disrupting adult's conversations.

Do you want to lose comic book and chocolate coin allowance.

[Biggie Smiles]

Something for all of you smart libtards to ponder.

true or false, at an estimated 7 billion in net worth Trump is the richest president in U.S history.

if he weren't so rich could he properly defend himself against this onslaught of lawfare waged by the left?

 Could anyone of average means do it?

If you answered no you've shown there is at least a handful of functioning braincells available for use inside your head


now riddle me this, after witnessing this nonstop siege against a single human being is any future candidate for such an office going to attempt to effect change on the establishment in any real and meaningful way? Or will they simply act according to the will of those really running this country out of fear the same might happen to them?

I think even someone as dumb as sewage major can sort that one out for themselves. Hopefully


and THAT is the point of the whole exercise.

I keep telling you assholes, Trump is nothing but a vessel, the best and most impressing example they could ever hope for to get the whole "stay the fuck in line" point across.

Didn't Chuck Shcumkfuck once blurt the quiet part out loud? "piss off the community and they have 7 ways from Sunday to get back at you"

well it's been 7 ways from Sunday and more than 7 years now and they haven't stopped yet.

I often ask myself if he is actually doing us all a disservice by fighting this galantly.. but then I check myself back into sensibility and affirm we've already crossed the point of no return and there is nothing left but to fight.

[Biggie Smiles]

Idiots on left saying "he was convicted by a jury of his peers!"

Yeah assholes, these people were also convicted by a jury of their peers

https://sddefenseattorneys.com/blog/famous-wrongful-conviction-cases/