Should the UN class BRITONS as INDIGENOUS ?

[IRISH KAM]

Man first came to Briton 800,000 years ago . ( Flint Tools carbon dated proves this )



Then after the last Ice Age man settled for good roughly 13,000 years ago .



So are the Britons indigenous ?



Whats ya Views ...........

[Anonymous]

Man first came to Briton 800,000 years ago . ( Flint Tools carbon dated proves this )



Then after the last Ice Age man settled for good roughly 13,000 years ago .



So are the Britons indigenous ?



Whats ya Views ...........

 ac_dunno

[kiebers]

What does it matter at this point? Is someone trying to say otherwise?

[Anonymous]

What does it matter at this point? Is someone trying to say otherwise?

I don't know about that either.

[kiebers]

Yep, with no context given it's kind of tough to weigh in.

[Anonymous]

Yep, with no context given it's kind of tough to weigh in.

Yes, it's lacking.

[IRISH KAM]

What does it matter at this point? Is someone trying to say otherwise?

Yeah Feller . The UN . ( UNITED NATIONS )



The UN desperately doesnt want ' Britons ' to be classed as indigenous .

Cos then Mass 3RD World immigration would have to STOP .



Under the UNs own Charter , Its a Breach of the ' Indigenous ' peoples Human Rights , if :

 ' Indigenous ' peoples Identity / Culture / Way of Life / Political Beliefs Ect are being wiped out by Mass Immigration .



Britons are being wiped out in their own Country , thru Mass 3RD World immigration .

WHITE Britons have been settled in EIRE / SCOTLAND / WALES / ENGLAND for 10s of 1000s of years .

Yet the UN says were NOT indigenous ?



Then the UN signed into law , that Maoris are Indigenous ?????

Even tho NZ and surrounding isles were settled ONLY 700 years ago !



UN says :

BRITONS ( 18,000 years ) NOT indigenous .

MAORIS ( 700 years ) ARE indigenous .



Work that one out ?

[kiebers]

That should have been in the OP.

[Anonymous]

What does it matter at this point? Is someone trying to say otherwise?

Yeah Feller . The UN . ( UNITED NATIONS )



The UN desperately doesnt want ' Britons ' to be classed as indigenous .

Cos then Mass 3RD World immigration would have to STOP .



Under the UNs own Charter , Its a Breach of the ' Indigenous ' peoples Human Rights , if :

 ' Indigenous ' peoples Identity / Culture / Way of Life / Political Beliefs Ect are being wiped out by Mass Immigration .



Britons are being wiped out in their own Country , thru Mass 3RD World immigration .

WHITE Britons have been settled in EIRE / SCOTLAND / WALES / ENGLAND for 10s of 1000s of years .

Yet the UN says were NOT indigenous ?



Then the UN signed into law , that Maoris are Indigenous ?????

Even tho NZ and surrounding isles were settled ONLY 700 years ago !



UN says :

BRITONS ( 18,000 years ) NOT indigenous .

MAORIS ( 700 years ) ARE indigenous .



Work that one out ?

The UN has an agenda.

[Wazzzup]

From wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indigenous_rights">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indigenous_rights

Indigenous rights are those rights that exist in recognition of the specific condition of the indigenous peoples. This includes not only the most basic human rights of physical survival and integrity, but also the preservation of their land, language, religion, and other elements of cultural heritage that are a part of their existence as a people.

Kam is right about the UN using double standards.  To them, whites can't be indigenous (even though they are) and certainly don't deserve indigenous rights.

[Anonymous]

From wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indigenous_rights">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indigenous_rights

Indigenous rights are those rights that exist in recognition of the specific condition of the indigenous peoples. This includes not only the most basic human rights of physical survival and integrity, but also the preservation of their land, language, religion, and other elements of cultural heritage that are a part of their existence as a people.

Kam is right about the UN using double standards.  To them, whites can't be indigenous (even though they are) and certainly don't deserve indigenous rights.

So, that would rule out Europeans since their languages are not at risk.

[Wazzzup]

From wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indigenous_rights">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indigenous_rights

Indigenous rights are those rights that exist in recognition of the specific condition of the indigenous peoples. This includes not only the most basic human rights of physical survival and integrity, but also the preservation of their land, language, religion, and other elements of cultural heritage that are a part of their existence as a people.

Kam is right about the UN using double standards.  To them, whites can't be indigenous (even though they are) and certainly don't deserve indigenous rights.

So, that would rule out Europeans since their languages are not at risk.

True their language is not at risk.  But their land is somewhat at risk, their culture is at risk, and their religion is definitely at risk.

[Anonymous]

From wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indigenous_rights">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indigenous_rights

Indigenous rights are those rights that exist in recognition of the specific condition of the indigenous peoples. This includes not only the most basic human rights of physical survival and integrity, but also the preservation of their land, language, religion, and other elements of cultural heritage that are a part of their existence as a people.

Kam is right about the UN using double standards.  To them, whites can't be indigenous (even though they are) and certainly don't deserve indigenous rights.

So, that would rule out Europeans since their languages are not at risk.

True their language is not at risk.  But their land is somewhat at risk, their culture is at risk, and their religion is definitely at risk.

They have voluntarily abandoned their religions..



Is their culture at risk or is it changing?

[IRISH KAM]

From wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indigenous_rights">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indigenous_rights

Indigenous rights are those rights that exist in recognition of the specific condition of the indigenous peoples. This includes not only the most basic human rights of physical survival and integrity, but also the preservation of their land, language, religion, and other elements of cultural heritage that are a part of their existence as a people.

Kam is right about the UN using double standards.  To them, whites can't be indigenous (even though they are) and certainly don't deserve indigenous rights.

So, that would rule out Europeans since their languages are not at risk.

European languages are at risk and have been for the last 20 years .



As 3RD World immigrants come to Europe and REFUSE to learn English .

There is 100s of immigrant dominated areas where English is not even a 2nd / 3rd / 4th language .

In london alone there is dozens of schools that have children using upto 41 different languages .

The Govt make it worst by NOT enforcing the learning of English by the adults .

If i get a letter from the Govt , its written in Dozens of languages .

So a one page letter turns into over 10 pages .

[Anonymous]

English is the world's second language..



It's not in danger.