China and Taiwan at war soon?

[Odinson]

We will fight to the last Taiwanese!



Make sure that the Chinese get nothing but ashes.

I don't know if young Taiwanese will do that.

Order No. 227.



Not a step back.

[Anonymous]

We will fight to the last Taiwanese!



Make sure that the Chinese get nothing but ashes.

I don't know if young Taiwanese will do that.

Order No. 227.



Not a step back.

Young Taiwanese are used to an easy affluent life.

[Odinson]

I wonder how the captain of the USS "Harvey Milk" feels...



You get a command... Wohoo!





Your ship is named after a homosexual who had an underaged lover.





As if serving in the navy doesnt have enough negative homosexual stereotypes.

[Anonymous]

I wonder how the captain of the USS "Harvey Milk" feels...



You get a command... Wohoo!





Your ship is named after a homosexual who had an underaged lover.





As if serving in the navy doesnt have enough negative homosexual stereotypes.

 ac_dunno

[Bricktop]

I wonder how the captain of the USS "Harvey Milk" feels...



You get a command... Wohoo!





Your ship is named after a homosexual who had an underaged lover.





As if serving in the navy doesnt have enough negative homosexual stereotypes.

The madness in America finds new ways to amaze the rest of the world.



 

[Odinson]

Is there any real reason as to why would the Chinese military perform any better than the North-Korean military?



Better supplied, better gear, industrial military capacity.





You can put a tuxedo on a reindeer... Its still a goat.

[Anonymous]

Is there any real reason as to why would the Chinese military perform any better than the North-Korean military?



Better supplied, better gear, industrial military capacity.





You can put a tuxedo on a reindeer... Its still a goat.

Who are you responding to?

[Odinson]

Is there any real reason as to why would the Chinese military perform any better than the North-Korean military?



Better supplied, better gear, industrial military capacity.





You can put a tuxedo on a reindeer... Its still a goat.

Who are you responding to?

I wasnt responding to any1.

[Anonymous]

Is there any real reason as to why would the Chinese military perform any better than the North-Korean military?



Better supplied, better gear, industrial military capacity.





You can put a tuxedo on a reindeer... Its still a goat.

Who are you responding to?

I wasnt responding to any1.

So, you're point is that powerful militaries are ones with enough money to buy all those things you mentioned?

[Odinson]

Is there any real reason as to why would the Chinese military perform any better than the North-Korean military?



Better supplied, better gear, industrial military capacity.





You can put a tuxedo on a reindeer... Its still a goat.

Who are you responding to?

I wasnt responding to any1.

So, you're point is that powerful militaries are ones with enough money to buy all those things you mentioned?

No... Thats why I said that you can put a tuxedo on a goat and its still gonna be just a goat.  ac_biggrin



My point is that even though the Chinese have better gear and resources, they are still gonna be like the North-Korean army.





They dont have the same skills in fighting a modern war as America does.



And it makes all the difference.

[Anonymous]

Is there any real reason as to why would the Chinese military perform any better than the North-Korean military?



Better supplied, better gear, industrial military capacity.





You can put a tuxedo on a reindeer... Its still a goat.

Who are you responding to?

I wasnt responding to any1.

So, you're point is that powerful militaries are ones with enough money to buy all those things you mentioned?

No... Thats why I said that you can put a tuxedo on a goat and its still gonna be just a goat.  ac_biggrin



My point is that even though the Chinese have better gear and resources, they are still gonna be like the North-Korean army.





They dont have the same skills in fighting a modern war as America does.



And it makes all the difference.

Are you sure about that. I read in some areas they are on par. In e-warfare they are ahead of the States.

[Zetsu]

If we look back at Chinese history, sometimes China can be very strong during the rise or first 100ish years of a new dynasty, strong when they're supposed to be weak and under developed, weak when they're developed but very corrupted and gets defeated by nomads less than 1% of their population.

[Zetsu]

Who are you responding to?

I wasnt responding to any1.

So, you're point is that powerful militaries are ones with enough money to buy all those things you mentioned?

No... Thats why I said that you can put a tuxedo on a goat and its still gonna be just a goat.  ac_biggrin



My point is that even though the Chinese have better gear and resources, they are still gonna be like the North-Korean army.





They dont have the same skills in fighting a modern war as America does.



And it makes all the difference.

Are you sure about that. I read in some areas they are on par. In e-warfare they are ahead of the States.

Even if we take both side's cards out of the equation, China is at a disadvantage when it comes to geography.  Problem is most of China's major cities are along the coastline.  If the US just fire just 1 or 2 missiles to the city centre to cause massive panic and most likely cripple their economy while it'll take a while before armed forces can arrive since most of their military complex are based inland.

[Anonymous]

If we look back at Chinese history, sometimes China can be very strong during the rise or first 100ish years of a new dynasty, strong when they're supposed to be weak and under developed, weak when they're developed but very corrupted and gets defeated by nomads less than 1% of their population.

The CCP dynasty is only 72 years old. They haven't reached the period of corruption and lack of focus that ended every other dynasty(yet).

[Zetsu]

If we look back at Chinese history, sometimes China can be very strong during the rise or first 100ish years of a new dynasty, strong when they're supposed to be weak and under developed, weak when they're developed but very corrupted and gets defeated by nomads less than 1% of their population.

The CCP dynasty is only 72 years old. They haven't reached the period of corruption and lack of focus that ended every other dynasty(yet).

There's no doubt that there's no developing country that is moving ahead faster than China, China knows it's not a good idea to offend the US and is smart enough to not fight against them head on, at least for now and seems like they will buy as much time as possible while learning from the mistakes of others including their own...