Re: What is sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander

[Anonymous]

Should we inject our kids so that a decaying generation feels safe?





Especially if the jabs have no long term.testing for adults much less children?



I'd die for my kids right now if necessary.



But this isn't that. Everybody must get stuck and if it goes wrong.... you get (now) a mere 10-15 years of basic salary in an award payment.



I'd rather be broke and teach my kids how to fight...

https://www.nytimes.com/2022/01/04/briefing/american-children-crisis-pandemic.html">https://www.nytimes.com/2022/01/04/brie ... demic.html">https://www.nytimes.com/2022/01/04/briefing/american-children-crisis-pandemic.html

Interesting enough, look what the NYTimes has to say now.



(hope the Cashews can recognize a screen shot instead of a meme)



https://media.gab.com/system/media_attachments/files/094/943/588/original/483b537ba525ce98.jpeg">



https://media.gab.com/system/media_attachments/files/094/943/589/original/9a35da75da31d40a.jpeg">

You and the Daily Wire are misrepresenting the article..



It was an editorial called No Way To Grow Up..

https://www.nytimes.com/2022/01/04/briefing/american-children-crisis-pandemic.html">https://www.nytimes.com/2022/01/04/brie ... demic.html">https://www.nytimes.com/2022/01/04/briefing/american-children-crisis-pandemic.html



It wasn't a scientific paper, let alone peer reviewed and it didn't refelct the management of the NYT..



It happens all the time......news publications occasionally post articles that don't represent management..



So, I don't know what you are trying to show with this.

[cc]

^^ Good spot & a lesson given in Newspapers 101   > "Editorials do not represent newspaper's views"



But it gaudily  plasters  3 screen  pages, so serves it's purpose  

[Anonymous]

^^ Good spot & a lesson given in Newspapers 101   > "Editorials do not represent newspaper's views"



But it gaudily  plasters  3 screen  pages, so serves it's purpose  

You are one hundred percent correct. I follow Sun News Media. They occasionally post editorials on climate change written by Thomas Mulcair that do not reflect the views of the publisher. And yes, it did take up too much room and was not a reply to anything.

[Blazor]

Should we inject our kids so that a decaying generation feels safe?





Especially if the jabs have no long term.testing for adults much less children?



I'd die for my kids right now if necessary.



But this isn't that. Everybody must get stuck and if it goes wrong.... you get (now) a mere 10-15 years of basic salary in an award payment.



I'd rather be broke and teach my kids how to fight...

https://www.nytimes.com/2022/01/04/briefing/american-children-crisis-pandemic.html">https://www.nytimes.com/2022/01/04/brie ... demic.html">https://www.nytimes.com/2022/01/04/briefing/american-children-crisis-pandemic.html

Interesting enough, look what the NYTimes has to say now.



(hope the Cashews can recognize a screen shot instead of a meme)



https://media.gab.com/system/media_attachments/files/094/943/588/original/483b537ba525ce98.jpeg">



https://media.gab.com/system/media_attachments/files/094/943/589/original/9a35da75da31d40a.jpeg">

You and the Daily Wire are misrepresenting the article..



It was an editorial called No Way To Grow Up..

https://www.nytimes.com/2022/01/04/briefing/american-children-crisis-pandemic.html">https://www.nytimes.com/2022/01/04/brie ... demic.html">https://www.nytimes.com/2022/01/04/briefing/american-children-crisis-pandemic.html



It wasn't a scientific paper, let alone peer reviewed and it didn't refelct the management of the NYT..



It happens all the time......news publications occasionally post articles that don't represent management..



So, I don't know what you are trying to show with this.

 



So let me get this straight, you condone kids being in harms way, to save adults?



Speak loudly into the microphone please.

[Blazor]

^^ Good spot & a lesson given in Newspapers 101   > "Editorials do not represent newspaper's views"



But it gaudily  plasters  3 screen  pages, so serves it's purpose  

It represents several peoples views. That children should not be harmed. That their elders are not "entitled".



Same question to you, do you condone children being in harms way, to save adults?

[cc]

do you condone children being in harms way

Whoa down here. Fash never commented on the content to which I replied. Nor did I



She was merely teaching you the difference between reporting facts as versus mere editorial "opinion"

[Anonymous]

do you condone children being in harms way

Whoa down here. Fash never commented on the content to which I replied. Nor did I



She was merely teaching you the difference between reporting facts as versus editorial opinion

That was really a below the belt deflection. Typical of the retardation the white Americans at BF post. Fash schools him, he gets angry and posts this shit. Meh, what the fuck ever.

[Blazor]

So y'all disagree with the article right? The article says "children being put at risk for adults to live" pretty much. Am I reading y'all's reactions wrong? I mean you're telling me the article is wrong in its belief.

[Anonymous]

This is where I'll put posts that were mistakenly posted on the main baord.

[Blazor]

Fuck this shit.



Peace.

[cc]

So y'all disagree with the article right? The article says "children being put at risk for adults to live" pretty much. Am I reading y'all's reactions wrong? I mean you're telling me the article is wrong in its belief.

Dead wrong. She expressed no opinion on any of it



She was schooling you in the distinct difference between Reporting and Editorializing .... your multiscreen taking image was some editorial only



She simply demonstrated that it did not speak for the Times in any way ... as you had appeared to promote that  it did

[cc]

So y'all disagree with the article right? The article says "children being put at risk for adults to live" pretty much. Am I reading y'all's reactions wrong? I mean you're telling me the article is wrong in its belief.

Dead wrong!!!!



No one has commented on the content in any way



a bit heavy on the Drama Queening, but Nice try tho ....

[Anonymous]

So y'all disagree with the article right? The article says "children being put at risk for adults to live" pretty much. Am I reading y'all's reactions wrong? I mean you're telling me the article is wrong in its belief.

You never even read it. You have to pay to read it and your minimum wage earning ass couldn't afford it.

[Anonymous]

So y'all disagree with the article right? The article says "children being put at risk for adults to live" pretty much. Am I reading y'all's reactions wrong? I mean you're telling me the article is wrong in its belief.

Dead wrong!!!!



No one has commented on the content in any way



a bit heavy on the Drama Queening, but Nice try tho ....

Indeed. No Academy award for his exaggerated performance.

[Anonymous]

Good thread idea.



I have been doing some checking the last couple days for anti vax memes and assorted crap. It is an industry. Lots of material for lazy minds to post. But, there is another side too. So, I thought I'd pull a Blazor and post away. Don't worry, I won't spam threads on the main board with this crap like others do.



Let's get started.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DyFJocqWkAAAhRZ?format=jpg&name=900x900">