News:

SMF - Just Installed!

 

The best topic

*

Forum gossip thread
Topic rating: 4.00

Other popular topics

Replies: 10395
Total votes: : 4

Last post: Today at 12:27:42 PM
Re: Forum gossip thread by Sloan

H

Dreamers and DACA

Started by Harry, September 04, 2017, 11:50:13 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Print
Go Down Pages 1 ... 5 6 7 8
User actions

Anonymous

#90
February 27, 2018, 04:01:19 PM
It's California, what do you expect. They like the cost and danger of illegals.

Anonymous

#91
July 17, 2021, 01:29:44 AM
A  federal judge in Texas on Friday ruled illegal an Obama-era program that prevents the deportation of thousands of them brought into the U.S. as children.

Anonymous

#92
July 17, 2021, 01:39:17 AM
Quote from: Herman post_id=415992 time=1626499784 user_id=1689
A  federal judge in Texas on Friday ruled illegal an Obama-era program that prevents the deportation of thousands of them brought into the U.S. as children.

 :thumbup:

Anonymous

#93
July 17, 2021, 12:48:29 PM
Quote from: Herman post_id=415992 time=1626499784 user_id=1689
A  federal judge in Texas on Friday ruled illegal an Obama-era program that prevents the deportation of thousands of them brought into the U.S. as children.

I remember a lot of coverage of Dreamers when Barack Obama was president.

Gaon

#94
July 17, 2021, 01:21:44 PM
In general, no they should not be allowed to stay. There will always be exceptions.
The Russian Rock It

Anonymous

#95
July 17, 2021, 02:54:26 PM
In theory, I support DACA(Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals).

cc

#96
July 17, 2021, 04:33:08 PM
I support only acceptance by formal application  ... run the process ... get approved and you are in like many people here or their parents did

Virtually NO exceptions



As for refugees, submit at embassy from own (or possibly other) country .. get formal OK, good to go ..



All border runners of all categories sneaking in illegally > Get out
I really tried to warn y\'all in 49  .. G. Orwell

Anonymous

#97
July 17, 2021, 04:37:04 PM
Quote from: cc post_id=416040 time=1626553988 user_id=88
I support only acceptance by formal application  ... run the process ... get approved and you are in like many people here or their parents did

Virtually NO exceptions



As for refugees, submit at embassy from own (or possibly other) country .. get formal OK, good to go ..



All border runners of all categories sneaking in illegally > Get out

I agree. But, I would have a hard cap on the number of immigrants admitted. Like about 5-10 percent of current admissions.

cc

#98
July 17, 2021, 04:45:28 PM
Yes. A cap that works for the admitting country is needed and should be decided so as to best  benefit the country



A cap including legit refugees
I really tried to warn y\'all in 49  .. G. Orwell

Anonymous

#99
July 17, 2021, 04:53:35 PM
Quote from: cc post_id=416044 time=1626554728 user_id=88
Yes. A cap that works for the admitting country is needed and should be decided so as to best  benefit the country



A cap including legit refugees

I firmly believe mass immigration like Canada and the States has only benefits the wealthy and powerful.

Anonymous

#100
July 17, 2021, 05:18:41 PM
Quote from: cc post_id=416044 time=1626554728 user_id=88
Yes. A cap that works for the admitting country is needed and should be decided so as to best  benefit the country



A cap including legit refugees

Immigration is what can you do for us not what can we do for you.

cc

#101
July 17, 2021, 05:27:05 PM
Quote from: Herman post_id=416052 time=1626556721 user_id=1689
Quote from: cc post_id=416044 time=1626554728 user_id=88
Yes. A cap that works for the admitting country is needed and should be decided so as to best  benefit the country



A cap including legit refugees

Immigration is what can you do for us not what can we do for you.

That's what it once was and should be
I really tried to warn y\'all in 49  .. G. Orwell

Anonymous

#102
July 17, 2021, 05:38:17 PM
Quote from: cc post_id=416056 time=1626557225 user_id=88
Quote from: Herman post_id=416052 time=1626556721 user_id=1689
Quote from: cc post_id=416044 time=1626554728 user_id=88
Yes. A cap that works for the admitting country is needed and should be decided so as to best  benefit the country



A cap including legit refugees

Immigration is what can you do for us not what can we do for you.

That's what it once was and should be

I should have posted immigration should be what can you do for us.

Anonymous

#103
July 18, 2021, 01:58:14 AM
Quote from: Herman post_id=416057 time=1626557897 user_id=1689
Quote from: cc post_id=416056 time=1626557225 user_id=88
Quote from: Herman post_id=416052 time=1626556721 user_id=1689
Quote from: cc post_id=416044 time=1626554728 user_id=88
Yes. A cap that works for the admitting country is needed and should be decided so as to best  benefit the country



A cap including legit refugees

Immigration is what can you do for us not what can we do for you.

That's what it once was and should be

I should have posted immigration should be what can you do for us.

I agree, but the number of immigrants admitted each year has to remain low. As for refugess-forget it.

Gaon

#104
July 18, 2021, 07:39:47 AM
Too many immigrants strains resources. They become a burden on the host country.
The Russian Rock It
Print
Go Up Pages 1 ... 5 6 7 8
User actions